Re: [EAI] ´ð¸´: I-D Action:draft-ietf-eai-downgraded-display-03.txt

[Alexey Melnikov <[e-mail]>]

Barry Leiba wrote:

>>>>>The last paragraph refer to "security considerations" in rfc5504 and
>>>>>rfc4952. But the security considerations in those documents are more about
>>>>>security issues for downgrading mechenisms. I suppose the security
>>>>>consideratioins in this document focuses more on downgraded-display. This
>>>>>should be clarified.
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>It's common to reference security considerations in related documents,
>>>to make sure that readers understand those as well.  I don't see that
>>>anything needs to be changed here.
>>>      
>>>
>>It is right to refer to security considerations in 5504 and 4952. I am saying the
>>security considerations in different documents focus on different aspects, it's
>>better to explicitly say that: this section focus on security issues of displaying
>>downgraded messages, for security considerations for downgrading mechanism
>>please see ....
>>    
>>
>OK, I see.  Yes, fair enough.  Alexey, would you add one more RFC Editor note?:
>
>Section 4:
>OLD:
>   See "Security considerations" section in [RFC5504] and [RFC4952] for
>   more discussion.
>NEW:
>   We have focused, here, on issues with displaying downgraded messages.  For
>   more discussion of downgraded and internationalized messages in general, see
>   the "Security considerations" sections in [RFC5504] and [RFC4952].
>  
>
Ok, added.