[EAI] EAI additions to POP and IMAP
"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 26 July 2011 13:48 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C992321F8B6A for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 06:48:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -111.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-111.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fLjob9Sld6bG for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 06:48:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A29621F8B77 for <ima@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 06:48:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 87079 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2011 13:48:23 -0000
Received: from gal.iecc.com (64.57.183.53) by mail2.iecc.com with SMTP; 26 Jul 2011 13:48:23 -0000
Received: (qmail 21947 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2011 13:48:22 -0000
Received: from mail1.iecc.com (64.57.183.56) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 26 Jul 2011 13:48:22 -0000
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:48:01 -0000
Message-ID: <20110726134801.14575.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ima@ietf.org
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Subject: [EAI] EAI additions to POP and IMAP
X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ima>
List-Post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:48:24 -0000
I've looked at 5721bis and 5738bis. They add a lot more states to the POP and IMAP state machines. So far as I can tell from a read-through, they're OK, but I worry that the new state machines might have dead ends or conflicts. To what extent have either or both of these been implemented, or have people worked out the state machines? R's from Quebec, John
- [EAI] EAI additions to POP and IMAP John Levine