[EAI] WITH protocol types Re: AD review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-04.txt

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alexey Melnikov" <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
To: "EAI WG" <ima@ietf.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2010 6:11 AM
Subject: [EAI] AD review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5336bis-04.txt

....
> 
> 4.  IANA Considerations
> 
>   +---------------+-----------------------------+---------------------+
>   | WITH protocol | Description                 | Reference           |
>   | types         |                             |                     |
>   +---------------+-----------------------------+---------------------+
>   | UTF8SMTPbis   | UTF8SMTPbis with Service    | [RFCXXXX]           |
>   |               | Extensions                  |                     |
>   | UTF8SMTPbisA  | UTF8SMTPbis with SMTP AUTH  | [RFC4954] [RFCXXXX] |
>   | UTF8SMTPbisS  | UTF8SMTPbis with STARTTLS   | [RFC3207] [RFCXXXX] |
>   | UTF8SMTPbisSA | UTF8SMTPbis with both       | [RFC3207] [RFC4954] |
>   |               | STARTTLS and SMTP AUTH      | [RFCXXXX]           |
>   +---------------+-----------------------------+---------------------+
> 
> Do we really need to change the WITH protocol types?
> 

RFC5336 has updated the WITH protocol types.
so this time, we might have to update it again.

the updates for WITH protocol types were suggested by Chris Newman  in RFC5336.

I think that Chris may have a better answer to this question.

Jiankang Yao

> 
>   [RFC2033]  Myers, J., "Local Mail Transfer Protocol", RFC 2033,
>              October 1996.
> 
> Make this reference Normative as per my earlier comment.
> 
> -- 
> IETF Application Area Director, <http://www.ietf.org/iesg/members.html>
> Internet Messaging Team Lead, <http://www.isode.com>
> JID: same as my email address
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IMA mailing list
> IMA@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima