Re: [EAI] Disposition of comments, Last Call on EAI documents

As soon as Chris puts the others on the IESG agenda (Chris ping me  
when you do) I can put DSN on the agenda.

Lisa

On Jun 9, 2008, at 3:15 PM, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:

> Based on the list of comments prepared by my co-chair, I have  
> verified against the latest drafts the following dispositions.
>
> I have called out those comments that have not resulted in changes  
> in the drafts; I believe all others have been adequately addressed:
>
> draft-ietf-eai-dsn-06:
> No comments requiring addressing.
>
> draft-ietf-eai-smtpext-12:
> Comment from Frank ellermann on -11: Addressed.
>
> Comments from Miguel Garcia (gen-ART reviewer) on -11:
>   A number of comments, all addressed in -12.
>
> draft-ietf-eai-utf8headers-11:
> Comment from Spencer Dawkins (gen-ART reviewer) on -09:
>   Most comments were addressed in -11. Some of them were
>   replied to on the mailing list.
>   Comment 7: the WG has  made a deliberate decision for
>     message/global, and this will not be changed.
>   Comment 8: Seems clear enough. Not changed.
>   Comment 9: Mac typecode specific, probably clear to those
>     who know about Mac UTIs.
>
> Comments from Frank Ellermann on -09 and -10:
>    All addressed, except the comment about "message-id" vs
>    "msg-id", and one NOTE IN DRAFT that has not been removed;
>    the last one can be fixed with the RFC Editor.
>
> To the best of my judgment, these documents are ready for IESG  
> processing.
>
>                 Harald Alvestrand, document shepherd
>
>
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
IMA mailing list
IMA@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima