Re: [EAI] Announcement: WG Consensus reached from IETF81 Quebec City
ned+ima@mrochek.com Mon, 08 August 2011 03:33 UTC
Return-Path: <ned+ima@mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B042421F8726 for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 20:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.217, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hK-UmFhokHVr for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 20:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [66.59.230.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269AD21F8715 for <ima@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 20:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01O4KYEWDIA800RIGK@mauve.mrochek.com> for ima@ietf.org; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 20:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01O4CJSMR6GG00VHKR@mauve.mrochek.com> (original mail from NED@mauve.mrochek.com) for ima@ietf.org; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 20:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: ned+ima@mrochek.com
Message-id: <01O4KYEUZVME00VHKR@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2011 20:31:37 -0700
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Mon, 01 Aug 2011 21:55:40 -0400" <19FC9CA3-0E2C-4727-81A8-37AD80B7F393@afilias.info>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN
References: <19FC9CA3-0E2C-4727-81A8-37AD80B7F393@afilias.info>
To: Joseph Yee <jyee@afilias.info>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mrochek.com; s=mauve; t=1312774312; bh=d90uOjjbXe3RUebD/q76OyMm1SCsI+UuA8BoZqElRs8=; h=From:Cc:Message-id:Date:Subject:In-reply-to:MIME-version: Content-type:References:To; b=POYYVvrzftZXv3WXO3IdSKnbAH4Var+xDSxwAWoj3DPp+dS3v9R7zZWkz4B9mHl6A Ed/lPp9IysXsCetCGU46uuojlf1OSPcHhP/6EyIgKr0iq4vRUBM8qQULf0/bnRTorY CsPzTYsJhvEXiboV+5Sm1T00vJVnGhN8sG8ABw1Y=
Cc: "ima@ietf.org WG" <ima@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [EAI] Announcement: WG Consensus reached from IETF81 Quebec City
X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ima>
List-Post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 03:33:39 -0000
> Hi All, > The WG had made the following tentative consensus calls during meeting at IETF 81 Quebec City. These results are considered final unless new substantive argument are raised on the list by August 8, 17:00 US Pacific Time. > (1) > WG Consensus on Message-ID header field: > Message-ID allows UTF-8 in any part of its value. I think this is a good simplification. > (2) > WG Consensus on Commentary Materials in RFC5335-bis: > RC5335bis will keep the draft's commentary materials in appendix section. This, OTOH, I'm less pleased with. I'd actually rather put this material in a separate document - the question is, is there a suitable document where it can go? Ned