Re: [imapext] MOVE
Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> Wed, 20 June 2012 15:12 UTC
Return-Path: <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62D521F85BD for <imapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:12:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pibyXUAfWXuC for <imapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:12:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from strange.aox.org (strange.aox.org [IPv6:2001:4d88:100c::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A2021F85E1 for <imapext@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:12:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by strange.aox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA35F8D803; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:12:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no by fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpsa id 1340205154-6884-6883/11/9; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:12:34 +0000
Message-Id: <4FE1E86F.7050808@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 17:12:47 +0200
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
References: <1340162867.5967.62.camel@hurina> <4FE16C05.8020607@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <3EAD7840FEFA64FD280FD21C@caldav.corp.apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <3EAD7840FEFA64FD280FD21C@caldav.corp.apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Cc: imapext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [imapext] MOVE
X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions <imapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/imapext>
List-Post: <mailto:imapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:12:37 -0000
On 06/20/2012 04:59 PM, Cyrus Daboo wrote: > I can live without MSN support if it really is a blocking issue, but > just for completeness it seems to me we ought to have it. But since > virtually no one actually uses my client now, my preference should not > block progress. I too would prefer to have it, if we can have it without the kind of soul-destroying discussion that we've had over each previous MOVE proposal. There are, at last count, 11 servers that either have MOVE, have committed to it, or have some *MOVE of their own. IMO, if all 11 can do MSN-based MOVE and none of us find a terrible problem with its specification, then my intuition is to include it. Uniformity is not a bad trait in protocols. Arnt
- [imapext] MOVE Timo Sirainen
- Re: [imapext] MOVE Timo Sirainen
- Re: [imapext] MOVE Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [imapext] MOVE Bron Gondwana
- Re: [imapext] MOVE Cyrus Daboo
- Re: [imapext] MOVE Arnt Gulbrandsen