Re: [imapext] Mail submission over IMAP

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Sat, 25 August 2012 18:42 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A343521F84D4 for <imapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 11:42:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.852
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.852 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.175, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wx5EZUPuYqAl for <imapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 11:42:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D580421F845E for <imapext@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 11:42:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lahm15 with SMTP id m15so1850722lah.31 for <imapext@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 11:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=fCCCgQjt6cUer60AvyfIwXgERCi2cSVM/CN0FuoPb0w=; b=U4ruLJjOiH2/hdRRLf0TtPdegMuyIwZZzHD4cwuDzbXE4ZHoI1EjE2wAFAOgisY7Sx 6JSK3YMbFbYozCAol8gSg1tFEI7p0lGc0A6tcDWwdEzOKGrGcNvNxGvIBhYmSuS8Fj9l ZURaWSfpMfqazDDd1Q3g7iflA7aL30dAFHnjG9kQ3EkkhOd6gZLwMlnmDwRVc4CSrIxk guYsF+e0YiloUZuUJyHCXvg0mlDVjQ0TNMWXfZxk48uCGjsNrxcLesi+hgV9cNNOgs// p+3S9sWe2R5Ws8E248xrM60OisvelD5TmBdLpTxCs6/PrW9eLdpq3nejQTRq4AsuUD5Z Gu3Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.43.135 with SMTP id w7mr4363292lbl.48.1345920122737; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 11:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.113.196 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 11:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <503906E1.8020706@flaska.net>
References: <500AE394.3010504@flaska.net> <503906E1.8020706@flaska.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 14:42:02 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Bh6krivkiLg6Mi5wKCBTZfFeNdQ
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVDHpiNd0WpQSn+Rv9_N8_oGVhF3Pf_ZPJQEipv6_h+Huw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Jan Kundrát <jkt@flaska.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: imapext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [imapext] Mail submission over IMAP
X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions <imapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/imapext>
List-Post: <mailto:imapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:42:04 -0000

> thanks for all the feedback I received. I've tried to incorporate that
> in the updated draft which lives on [1].
> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kundrat-imap-submit-00
...
> So, does this extension have any chance of getting standardized and
> supported?

...and...

> I haven't received much feedback on this incremental thread topic. The
> draft now lives on the IETF's web [1].
> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kundrat-incthread-00

One answer to both of these is the same: right now, the focus on this
mailing list is on the imapmove working group, to get the IMAP MOVE
spec done.  It's up to the chairs how much other discussion they want
to have on the list, and so far they've allowed discussion of these
other topics, but neither of these specs is going to move toward
standardization at this point.

After the imapmove working group's work is done, we can consider doing
another fast chartering job if there's enough interest in pursuing one
or both of these.  You may certainly keep the drafts alive in the
meantime.  Just be aware that the ADs are not going to be putting them
through the standards process until imapmove is done, at least.

Barry, App AD