Re: So, do we meet?

Alexey Melnikov <mel@messagingdirect.com> Fri, 23 February 2001 19:10 UTC

Received: by above.proper.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA05792 for ietf-imapext-bks; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:10:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rembrandt.esys.ca (IDENT:root@rembrandt.esys.ca [198.161.92.131]) by above.proper.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA05787 for <ietf-imapext@imc.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:10:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from messagingdirect.com (gagarin.esys.ca [198.161.92.84]) (authenticated) by rembrandt.esys.ca (8.11.0.Beta0/8.11.0.Beta0) with ESMTP id f1NJ78v11142; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:07:08 -0700
Message-ID: <3A96B4DC.FD85289B@messagingdirect.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:07:08 -0700
From: Alexey Melnikov <mel@messagingdirect.com>
Organization: ACI WorldWide / MessagingDirect
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cyrus Daboo <daboo@cyrusoft.com>
CC: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>, ietf-imapext@imc.org
Subject: Re: So, do we meet?
References: <38320000.982945032@socrates>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf-imapext@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-imapext/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-imapext.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-imapext-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

Cyrus Daboo wrote:

> --On Friday, February 23, 2001 09:35:37 AM -0600 Pete Resnick
> <presnick@qualcomm.com> wrote:
>
> > OK, the deadline approaches. I have heard several people say they should
> > have drafts ready. Am I to believe from that we will have things to
> > discuss?
> >
> > Shall we meet in Minneapolis? Yay or nay?
>
> My vote is yes.

I am second to say yes.

> Maybe we only need a one hour session rather than two?
>
> There are a number of drafts that are close to last call status IMHO - some
> of them aren't strictly in our charter but we are marshalling them through,
> right. It would be good to have a summary of all the drafts in progress and
> their current status so we can see where we're going with them.
>
> Here's my summary of all IMAP related drafts:
>
> draft-crispin-imapv-14.txt
>   Base-spec bug fixes. Last call 4-Jan-2001. Presumably this can now move
> forward, or have there been corrections that require it to be re-issued?
>
> draft-crispin-imap-multiappend-03.txt
>   Last call 4-Jan-2001. Status?
>
> draft-ietf-imapext-sort-06.txt
> draft-ietf-imapext-thread-06.txt
> draft-ietf-imapext-view-00.txt
>   There are now multiple client/server implementations of sort and thread
> and more people looking to add these to their implementations. Its
> therefore important we get some kind of consensus on these moving forward.
> Also, I'm still unsure as to what other people really want from VIEW.
> There's hasn't been much feedback after my last post.
>
> draft-ietf-imapext-annotate-00.txt
>   Randy's working on an update.
>
> draft-ietf-imapext-acl-01.txt
>   Status?
>
> draft-ietf-imapext-regex-00.txt
>   Status?
>
> draft-ietf-imapext-list-extensions-00.txt
>   Status?
>
> draft-nerenberg-imap-binary-02.txt
>   New draft posted 15-Feb-2001
>
> draft-melnikov-imap-mdn-03.txt
>   Status?

I would like to publish it as Informational or BCP. It is probably time for
Last Call.


I've just submitted a new draft ietf-melnikov-imap-condstore-00.txt. It should
appear in draft repository shortly.

I've also submitted a new revision of LANGUAGE draft (I am co-author now).

Alexey