Re: [imapext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-imapmove-command-02.txt

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Tue, 30 October 2012 12:19 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458C721F857C for <imapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 05:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OTgt9+BNyChb for <imapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 05:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from waldorf.isode.com (cl-125.lon-03.gb.sixxs.net [IPv6:2a00:14f0:e000:7c::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EBB221F857D for <imapext@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 05:19:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1351599566; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=Ua7ll29/Tk5P68x5Ff99/2dhvGb+/P1bpP3VIZf8+zg=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=c8vV1uyOBAo1W113i0FETDQAml2dmuHe7OBWVDVC+bCKXIiC2m+AY9XtJo88pj25A+6TlF vFmlDFrxoVYPCdraDzKAV+7OpQQ2/9/wBh3cOMeZvtUclTcoRgoOZOuswj4OBgqc10sTiC JLT0qgs2VaAW7ik0PthIZ3lAPYU3r0c=;
Received: from [172.16.1.29] (shiny.isode.com [62.3.217.250]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <UI=FywBVoJc-@waldorf.isode.com>; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 12:19:25 +0000
Message-ID: <508FC5F3.1070905@isode.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 12:20:03 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
To: Jan Kundrát <jkt@flaska.net>
References: <fd9daf3f-3eda-475a-9edc-afdf37e8e153@flaska.net>
In-Reply-To: <fd9daf3f-3eda-475a-9edc-afdf37e8e153@flaska.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: imapext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [imapext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-imapmove-command-02.txt
X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions <imapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/imapext>
List-Post: <mailto:imapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 12:19:31 -0000

On 29/10/2012 14:08, Jan Kundrát wrote:
>> The QUOTA extension (defined by [RFC2087]) may interact with MOVE, on
>> some servers, in the sense that a MOVE command may succeed where COPY
>> would cause a quota overrun.  This may be user-visible, but should
>> not be MUA-visible.
>
> Hi Arnt, it isn't clear to me what this paragraph actually means -- 
> what's the difference between "MUA-visible" and user-visible?

I am agreeing with you and Ned that removing the last quoted sentence is 
the best way forward.

> Apart from that, I don't see any errors in this draft.

Good.