IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [imapext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-03.txt

Jan Kundrát <jkt@flaska.net> Tue, 03 December 2013 10:45 UTC

Return-Path: <jkt@flaska.net>
X-Original-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84EED1AE0FC for <imapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 02:45:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CUJj6Qm9e-t7 for <imapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 02:45:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from latimerie.flaska.net (latimerie.flaska.net [IPv6:2a02:2b88:2:1::4a7:333]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50771AE0C5 for <imapext@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 02:45:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by latimerie.flaska.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9669963184; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 11:45:38 +0100 (CET)
From: Jan Kundrát <jkt@flaska.net>
To: imapext@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 11:45:38 +0100
User-Agent: Trojita/v0.3.96-130-gf259349; Qt/4.8.5; X11; Linux;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b5cdcca2-66f9-4d52-86ec-acf29fb44d73@flaska.net>
In-Reply-To: <08f2fdeb-957f-4ed4-a827-bdce2094275f@flaska.net>
References: <20131008141122.25649.73956.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <368e22b4-930e-4882-bca4-8b23bc3d4b06@flaska.net> <5293A4FF.6030406@isode.com> <08f2fdeb-957f-4ed4-a827-bdce2094275f@flaska.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [imapext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-qresync-rfc5162bis-03.txt
X-BeenThere: imapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IMAP extensions <imapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/imapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:imapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imapext>, <mailto:imapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 10:45:45 -0000

So, with the WG last call deadline approaching, I would appreciate some 
sort of feedback on the points I raised.

The so far unaddressed issues are:

- Some corner cases are not well-defined when it comes to VANISHED 
reporting of messages which were just made available to the client via 
EXISTS.

- Relation with METADATA and ANNOTATE-EXPERIMENT-1. What I would like to 
see here is explicit confirmation that any change in METADATA increments 
the HIGHESTMODSEQ and that the data tracked by ANNOTATE-EXPERIMENT-1 are in 
fact "metadata" to be included in the MODSEQ tracking.

With kind regards,
Jan

-- 
Trojitá, a fast Qt IMAP e-mail client -- http://trojita.flaska.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email