Re: [Inip-discuss] Innovation in DNS

Hi there

> Unlike com zone, root zone is accessed every time when DNS resolution for
> unknown domain name is requested no matter which TLD zone the unknown
> domain name belongs to.

>Not true.  That claim ignores the effects of TTLs.

> *So, increase of SLD together with TLD, increases rate of DNS resolution
> query to root nameserver. *

>So?

Andrew, would you explain the effects of TLL related to that claim.

For the purpose of clarification of the claim, TTL specifies time it will
be in cache of DNS resolver. I  point you to “request to *unknown domain
name*” and it means that there is no record data for the unknown domain
name not just on Internet users PC but also in DNS resolvers cache.

As for the risk it brings, what kind of risk are you mentioning?
Cybersquatting, risk of switching to AINA System or other risks?

I want to draw your attention to the part where implementation of the AINA
System is described. As you can see for the purpose of simplicity,
switching to AINA System can be conducted through three scenarios. (at
least three and it is up to imagination). The first one is the one which
has no risk, and what needed is just to direct requests to AINA System in
case of unknown domain name for root nameservers.

Many problems may rise here not from the technical aspect but rather from
political or business interest aspects. And I hopefully believe that the
discussions conducted here is out of that topics.

Thanks

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 05:24:21PM +0100, Bauyrzhan Askar wrote:
> > Unlike com zone, root zone is accessed every time when DNS resolution for
> > unknown domain name is requested no matter which TLD zone the unknown
> > domain name belongs to.
>
> Not true.  That claim ignores the effects of TTLs.
>
> > *So, increase of SLD together with TLD, increases rate of DNS resolution
> > query to root nameserver. *
>
> So?
>
> > But the problem here is that when TLD list increases and any entry or
> > update made to the root zone file in master root nameserver, all root
> > nameservers have to be updated which in turn
> >
> > 1)     increases the load to network handling root nameservers. (this may
> > not be a big problem at the moment)
> >
> > 2)     increases the time for update to be finished throughout the world
> > because of increased number of copies of root nameservers.
> >
> > 3)     increases the load to any particular root nameserver, no matter of
> > number of copies of root nameserver, because of the increased rate of
> > updates.
>
> All of this is true of the com zone, too, so I don't see how it's
> relevant at all.  I just don't see that this is a significant
> improvement of the DNS, and it involves adding changes to the system
> that present their own risks.  If we're going to undertake such risks,
> it seems to me a tiny incremental improvement to address no actual
> practical problem anyone has for only one zone seems like a low
> return on the investment.
>
> Best regards,
>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Inip-discuss mailing list
> Inip-discuss@iab.org
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/inip-discuss
>