[Insipid] Next version of the backwards compatibility proposal
James Polk <jmpolk@cisco.com> Thu, 24 October 2013 22:26 UTC
Return-Path: <jmpolk@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4201511E8242 for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:26:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RAKfq7hiWE3I for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A256311E81C7 for <insipid@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:26:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=664; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1382653564; x=1383863164; h=message-id:date:to:from:subject:cc:mime-version; bh=V0VSkVWqAVQLSg5aSI3OWqyxgS54zNeZcbp9hgai9F8=; b=Dwfty9mkSwvPKE14ITTmUNlnTSg527cbSKT5dzEZnJNj473MmKyiUcng AEDjTEbxqS73SXiALKIjEaWn1RHj1HIriG0ypmCnIjVsEv2uOgJF3tRwH VQPWF4QV8WOKWATv7KzlVYzBkkcBO7h0ky6p22qespww1c9R7HkY6Lw0J E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AngGABOeaVKtJXG8/2dsb2JhbABZgwc4vyeBHxZtB4JkAj8XJRUfCkQch34NujSPTYQzA4k/oFKDQh4
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,565,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="276441687"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2013 22:26:03 +0000
Received: from jmpolk-WS.cisco.com (rcdn-vpn-client-10-89-1-86.cisco.com [10.89.1.86]) (authenticated bits=0) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9OMQ2Pv004316 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 24 Oct 2013 22:26:02 GMT
Message-Id: <201310242226.r9OMQ2Pv004316@rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:26:02 -0500
To: "insipid@ietf.org" <insipid@ietf.org>
From: James Polk <jmpolk@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Authenticated-User: jmpolk
Cc: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
Subject: [Insipid] Next version of the backwards compatibility proposal
X-BeenThere: insipid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <insipid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/insipid>
List-Post: <mailto:insipid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 22:26:14 -0000
INSIPID Here is the next version of the proposal for backwards compatibility between the insipid and kaplan versions of the Session-ID header. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-polk-insipid-bkwds-compatibility-proposal-03.txt There is a new section dealing with alternative proposals for a 'flag' to indicate which implementation an endpoint is, namely either a new option tag or a Contact header feature tag. I list the reasons why I don't think either will work. I'd like to get this draft discussed, as well as the two alternative flags on the list before we have our face2face in Vancouver on Monday evening, Nov 4th. James
- [Insipid] Next version of the backwards compatibi… James Polk
- Re: [Insipid] Next version of the backwards compa… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Insipid] Next version of the backwards compa… James Polk
- Re: [Insipid] Next version of the backwards compa… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Insipid] Next version of the backwards compa… James Polk