[Insipid] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-26: (with COMMENT)

"Mirja Kuehlewind" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Mon, 15 August 2016 16:13 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <147127762657.31575.1906620729773289468.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 09:13:46 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/insipid/UiP8T1GBSzRnXYHgulXVI8r-YMs>
Cc: insipid@ietf.org, insipid-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-insipid-session-id@ietf.org, christer.holmberg@ericsson.com
Subject: [Insipid] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-26: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-26: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-insipid-session-id/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm wondering, given that RFC 7329 is informational and given that this
doc is backwards-compatitile to it, if this doc really obsoletes RFC7329,
or just updates it...?

Re: [Insipid] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on d… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
Re: [Insipid] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on d… Ben Campbell
Re: [Insipid] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on d… Paul Giralt (pgiralt)
[Insipid] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft… Mirja Kuehlewind