Re: [Insipid] No IPR declarations on draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id

As I mentioned during the session in Berlin, disclosure 1716 (on 
draft-ietf-insipid-session-id) is in the process of being updated.
I'm told that will happen very soon now.

That same IPR does need to be disclosed against this draft, and I expect 
the disclosure to come out near the same time 1716 is updated.

I am embarrassed that I didn't get this done earlier.

RjS

On 9/13/13 4:57 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as you know, draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id is undergoing an IETF LC. I
> just want to bring the attention to this WG to the following part of the
> shepherd writeup for the draft:
>
>      (8) Has an IPR disclosure been filed that references this document?
>          If so, summarize any discussion and conclusion regarding the IPR
>          disclosures.
>
> No IPR disclosures are filed against this draft or on its predecessors
> under different names. It is possible that disclosures filed against
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-reqts/
> or https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id/
> could also apply to this document, but no declaration has been made to
> that effect.
>
>
> The following are the links to those IPR disclosures, in case someone
> feels the need to disclose something against
> draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id as well:
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=document_search&id=draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-reqts
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=document_search&id=draft-ietf-insipid-session-id
>
> Cheers,
>
> Gonzalo
>
> _______________________________________________
> insipid mailing list
> insipid@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid