IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] I-D Action:draft-ietf-intarea-server-logging-recommendations-02.txt

Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 15 February 2011 22:23 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3D33A6B0B for <int-area@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:23:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.204
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.204 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.565, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fXSffK2aHSCm for <int-area@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:23:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40EF3A6C3B for <int-area@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:23:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so815007fxm.31 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:24:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=EKKrJ1+WdZ1DcMkB8tqG5FtQ03/TT//zwiNb8g+iG64=; b=FpYLF/Pu6EAwJmoeUg/xnkOufwPIQsLm+HAx8qXeLLoUfZ3/JQhE5aUeMwaGFlbsTl VDQrfLiSxGVRjeCo8QdDozJ+guxaMHh0ostwRmoCObp43o/lOxEWOtbhkkS+SyqiMtMd zJZBKdIovrlc70Utdy8qy7XcdEgv21PCjRioU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=okBRmILCNS++RhOSIWxUW8X2Cz6ivTPTiY7Q0GL3RGEKGQ4svAKdh8iAoeOVqFpqUS nTNV2A4J7N3pZ4lAIwdy/uMKjRfyx3LvGn5wGcexCs+1WFkaUW7W8iotXAam34hNFLbk YEfCGcD3MFK52pMftMpJVFA0skeICex3T/XLE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.103.4 with SMTP id i4mr6874246fao.123.1297808655281; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:24:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.74.142 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:24:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <205ED2FF-1B67-4F9B-9A0D-1C97487D6776@juniper.net>
References: <20110119183002.30410.51185.idtracker@localhost> <98A16B2D00B5724F81E80EF1927A029703FC95@nasanexd01e.na.qualcomm.com> <31963_1297088150_4D4FFE96_31963_99436_1_94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F33C44015A86@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <D2DB65CB-C48E-48E3-AAEB-7277837BCBFB@juniper.net> <12200_1297333968_4D53BED0_12200_36165_1_94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F33C443B8C0C@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <F823624C-23C7-4960-B9A4-FA1C45B569C2@juniper.net> <31963_1297428940_4D5531CC_31963_380837_1_94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F33C443B925D@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <AANLkTi=wvMnRAVrU23fq3XSinF7pn-yBzooU2wf7JobS@mail.gmail.com> <3155_1297666425_4D58D179_3155_247779_1_94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F33C443B9542@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <205ED2FF-1B67-4F9B-9A0D-1C97487D6776@juniper.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:24:15 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTimvCNPg6_jhKfAnUC3Bn4gnSL6NJTB1n6X-zm3w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Alain Durand <adurand@juniper.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Julien Laganier <julienl@qualcomm.com>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-intarea-server-logging-recommendations@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-intarea-server-logging-recommendations@tools.ietf.org>, Vogt <christian.vogt@ericsson.com>, "Christian@core3.amsl.com" <Christian@core3.amsl.com>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] I-D Action:draft-ietf-intarea-server-logging-recommendations-02.txt
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/int-area>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 22:23:51 -0000

Folks,

The WGLC for this draft has concluded. Med made proposed some
modifications but there was no consensus to change the draft thus we
considered that this draft reflects WG consensus and we will forward
to IESG for publication.

--julien

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Alain Durand <adurand@juniper.net> wrote:
>
> On Feb 14, 2011, at 1:53 AM, <mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com> <mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Julien,
>>
>> This is fair but IP-related information is conveyed sometimes at the application layer. I provided XFF as an example, other application-specific headers can be considered for other internet-facing servers (e.g., SIP/SPTM/etc.).
>>
>> Having something like the following in the I-D would be fine with me:
>>
>> "Note that information about the identity of the source (e.g., source IP address, source port number) can be leaked in the application payload. It is encouraged to log this information too."
>>
>
>
> Again, this was discussed and ruled out of scope.
>
>  - Alain.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email