Re: [Int-area] Reviews of "IP Router Alert Considerations" document

Francois Le Faucheur <flefauch@cisco.com> Mon, 25 October 2010 16:03 UTC

Return-Path: <flefauch@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776933A68CE for <int-area@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:03:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.555
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.044, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QgOnH3is795I for <int-area@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAFE03A6A7F for <int-area@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: ams-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,236,1286150400"; d="scan'208";a="67498359"
Received: from ams-core-3.cisco.com ([144.254.72.76]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Oct 2010 16:04:42 +0000
Received: from ams-flefauch-87111.cisco.com (ams-flefauch-87111.cisco.com [10.55.161.204]) by ams-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o9PG4fLO002762; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:04:41 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Francois Le Faucheur <flefauch@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5CAADD76-8815-4681-B945-DD12C747B907@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:04:42 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <738EF258-9E5F-4867-AAAD-4E0D8A2D5224@cisco.com>
References: <5CAADD76-8815-4681-B945-DD12C747B907@ericsson.com>
To: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: Julien Laganier <julienl@qualcomm.com>, Internet Area Mailing List <int-area@ietf.org>, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Reviews of "IP Router Alert Considerations" document
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/int-area>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:03:09 -0000

Hello Christian,

On 13 Sep 2010, at 22:58, Christian Vogt wrote:

> Folks, FYI:
> 
> We have asked Fred Baker, Joel Halpern, Suresh Krishnan, and Ron Bonica to review Francois' document "IP Router Alert Considerations and Usage" [1].  Based on these reviews, and based on the reviews of other working group members, we will decide on whether the document is ready for working group last call.  Your participation in this discussion will be appreciated.

Comments from Fred, Joel and Suresh have been received & discussed on the list. I believe they indicate the document is in good shape.

A new version (draft-ietf-intarea-router-alert-considerations-02) has just been posted reflecting the details of the corresponding comments/discussions.

Could we proceed to Last Call of the new version? or are you expecting more feedback/reviews?

Thanks

Francois