Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp-03

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Thu, 26 May 2016 18:26 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD7E12D553 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2016 11:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id byWuNohj8mp0 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2016 11:26:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nitro.isi.edu (nitro.isi.edu [128.9.208.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E4D312B004 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 May 2016 11:26:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.184.137] ([128.9.184.137]) (authenticated bits=0) by nitro.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u4QIQElp020596 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 26 May 2016 11:26:14 -0700 (PDT)
To: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
References: <E83B905A-FF6D-4996-B71A-7921DE4B133B@ericsson.com> <BFC09F5C-D6DF-4B6B-AA95-03919B9F09FB@cisco.com> <573E2A0E.1060609@isi.edu> <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE0D54EB60@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <CAPt1N1=UTDghtSmw6+x=OQsvkSLHs2Gyi8ZeSK4a2L=bwqK57Q@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S36rMbOniAKYHifwPE0eQtDg+CwDXwPG02NZ2yVSx5xadg@mail.gmail.com> <cfd23a013e544312b857374933e97106@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CALx6S36SsdTNOT=5VzX27_r=iadONwmz9+qPxPWJ1+f1i25YtA@mail.gmail.com> <f0752fc49e9d44ce9b301c40d4aafc63@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <57472576.3040501@isi.edu> <ce3d752685264ce7a7d8f11f189c622c@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <57472AD8.1090200@isi.edu> <c0277cce5b744fc6b38638e41845ca5a@XCH15-05-05.nw.nos.boeing.com> <956622dd-93f3-2a9e-51b8-16db1598776e@isi.edu> <CALx6S34vY3-TRiLVCWWSiEJHuOneX=562a+VeuN3VzBBVDB2iw@mail.gmail.com> <574738E0.2050206@isi.edu> <CALx6S34v-Z=nm57NbFQxY7Ju3JaxvADkZXR=Vc-9qWfpD3qpBg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Message-ID: <57473FC5.2000303@isi.edu>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 11:26:13 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CALx6S34v-Z=nm57NbFQxY7Ju3JaxvADkZXR=Vc-9qWfpD3qpBg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MailScanner-ID: u4QIQElp020596
X-ISI-4-69-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/9JVs5u66YzYvn7ADZ7Y93AkFcMg>
Cc: "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp-03
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 18:26:36 -0000


On 5/26/2016 11:22 AM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> wrote:
>>
>> On 5/26/2016 10:52 AM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> wrote:
>>>> Here's the problem:
>>>>
>>>> The first 4 bits are either part of the GUE header or IPv4 or IPv6.
>>>>
>>>> In the diagrams in draft-ietf-nvo3-gue and RFC791 they're indicated in the
>>>> following bit order: 0,1,2,3
>>>>
>>>> In GUE, these are 0,0,x,x
>>>>
>>>> In IPv4, these are 0,0,1,0
>>>>
>>>> In IPv6, these are 0,1,1,0
>>>>
>>> IPv4 is 0,1,0,0.
>> Not LSB to MSB, which is how both GUE and RFC791 define the header:
>>
> >From RFC791:
>
> "Whenever an octet represents a numeric quantity the left most bit in
> the diagram is the high order or most significant bit.  That is, the
> bit
> labeled 0 is the most significant bit."
Arrgh.

Yup. OK, so the reason this would work is only because we no longer use
IP versions 0..3.

Got it.

Joe