Re: [Int-area] draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels

Lucy yong <lucy.yong@huawei.com> Sun, 01 November 2015 00:57 UTC

Return-Path: <lucy.yong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7571B4A75 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 17:57:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7nMR8OrPL9KI for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 17:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E3861B4A6E for <int-area@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 17:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BZP74751; Sun, 01 Nov 2015 00:57:42 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DFWEML704-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.141) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Sun, 1 Nov 2015 00:56:41 +0000
Received: from DFWEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.50]) by dfweml704-chm ([10.193.5.141]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 17:56:36 -0700
From: Lucy yong <lucy.yong@huawei.com>
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels
Thread-Index: AdEMOrWu53lS9XlmSGiq1iu9C8boGQAXlnQAAelD9iA=
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2015 00:56:34 +0000
Message-ID: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D572034A0@dfweml701-chm>
References: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D571FF224@dfweml701-chm> <56282A02.5000408@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <56282A02.5000408@isi.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.194.187.67]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/CqKnlKu6LOavVtGTzT1o91aAlUs>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2015 00:57:46 -0000

Hi Joe,

Your tunnel draft addresses IP tunnel in the Internet, i.e. both M network and N network (in the draft) are on the Internet. 

The draft describes the arch and req. for use portion of the Internet providing a link to other portion of the Internet.

There are also applications that using portion of the Internet provides many links to individual private IP networks, i.e. one link to one private IP network. e.g. network virtualization. 

It would be useful for your draft to explicitly distinct two cases and point out the requirements for both cases. For example, ICMP usage.

Regards,
Lucy