[Int-area] Feedback on draft-andersdotter-intarea-update-to-rfc6302-00

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Sun, 11 November 2018 19:20 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A93A1286E7 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 11:20:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=UwrIxEtV; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=mwdpR/ed
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xu97CHFQbR0l for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 11:20:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C742C126BED for <int-area@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 11:20:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([197.226.51.21]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id wABJJhLT029443 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Nov 2018 11:19:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1541963995; x=1542050395; bh=2qTMuJrj+GPSiOrFAhnme+vzIpk2Iqvk+9JAUFnJRP4=; h=Date:To:From:Subject; b=UwrIxEtVbn7XOIcxyRC39qEj8KRbqxq++VH0Hcfx6EDBspUwQTgj3A9DXUdtVCWbY oZxUlFqMTnEDaqsDBhU6qlJdVuyeSW6pSGfDTZBHFexvuPy5ndXW9BQnYJMXW+A6FV i6n+kc2m4iWMPuprDnDDQdga+f2uZ+VocEzDxMgk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1541963995; x=1542050395; i=@elandsys.com; bh=2qTMuJrj+GPSiOrFAhnme+vzIpk2Iqvk+9JAUFnJRP4=; h=Date:To:From:Subject; b=mwdpR/edgFgH27UoVYo9WoKGckRu/X/zXNSUp57OVLZlx+VJAdao5MfSnfcsW72Nh QJAPp0o3AGR0/Xe3G/iU37SDEUM7Lid4wANogHNUOiSVfcW/Fpwx0SunBXmOcfvVz9 s/JO4hBjJNkVZ2N7evoXgF2lKqDZ5GNwFoKxZfuY=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20181111104756.0bd7f998@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 11:11:41 -0800
To: Amelia Andersdotter <amelia@article19.org>, int-area@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/E19A1xc_XP8Qgt51-eeSUQPLgjE>
Subject: [Int-area] Feedback on draft-andersdotter-intarea-update-to-rfc6302-00
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 19:20:03 -0000

Hi Amelia,

I read draft-andersdotter-intarea-update-to-rfc6302-00 (expired) 
several months ago.  I unfortunately did have time to comment because 
of a significant increase in workload.  I had an email exchange [1] 
with one of the RFC authors about RFC 6302.  Was there any feedback 
on your draft?  if that is the case, could you please point me to it 
or share a quick summary?

By the way, there was an article [2] about your draft by "one of the 
most influential research and advisory firms in the world".

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

1. It is in the Internet Area mailing list archive.
2. 
https://go.forrester.com/blogs/ietf-takes-gdpr-influence-a-little-too-far-in-its-draft-standard-for-logging-for-internet-facing-servers/