Re: [Int-area] CGA & SeND extensions discussion

Wassim Haddad <whaddad@tcs.hut.fi> Mon, 20 November 2006 13:27 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gm9At-0003Gr-6w; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:27:03 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gm9Ar-0003GJ-Ng; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:27:01 -0500
Received: from neon.tcs.hut.fi ([130.233.215.20] helo=mail.tcs.hut.fi) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gm9Ap-00033T-7u; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:27:01 -0500
Received: by mail.tcs.hut.fi (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 9449E2C020BB7; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:26:58 +0200 (EET)
X-Spam-TCS: No
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-tcs20061018 (2006-10-05) on mail.tcs.hut.fi
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.7-tcs20061018
X-Spam-TCS-score: 0.0
Received: from rhea.tcs.hut.fi (rhea.tcs.hut.fi [130.233.215.147]) by mail.tcs.hut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0412C020BB5; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:26:58 +0200 (EET)
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:26:58 +0200
From: Wassim Haddad <whaddad@tcs.hut.fi>
To: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] CGA & SeND extensions discussion
In-Reply-To: <c21dd5dda8a5ba865571fdbd64c11c3b@it.uc3m.es>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0611201521030.24812@rhea.tcs.hut.fi>
References: <c21dd5dda8a5ba865571fdbd64c11c3b@it.uc3m.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 25620135586de10c627e3628c432b04a
Cc: SEND WG <ietf-send@standards.ericsson.net>, cga-ext@ietf.org, INT Area <int-area@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: int-area@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/int-area>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: int-area-bounces@lists.ietf.org

Hi Marcelo,

We also would like to include the ongoing SEND Optimization (OptiSEND)
work (draft-haddad-mipshop-optisend-02).


Regards,

Wassim H.


On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As a follow-up from James Kempf presentation in the Internet Area
> meeting in San Diego, we have created a mailing list to discuss
> potential future work related to CGA and SeND extensions. The main goal
> is to identify possible work items that the community is interested in
> doing some work on.
>
> You can subscribe to the list through:
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext
>
> I include a list of extensions that have been proposed over the last
> few years that could be possible candidates to work on, depending on
> the interest expressed. Please note that this is rough list, so maybe
> some of the items included may not be clearly within the scope of the
> work and there may be other items that i have missed.
>
> - Proxy SeND. The idea here is to define SeND and CGA extensions so
> that SeND can be used with Proxy ND. Reference:
> draft-kempf-mobopts-ringsig-ndproxy-01.txt
> - Define extensions to Multi-Key CGAs: The idea here is to allow the
> possibility of including multiple public keys in a single CGA
> Parameter Data Structure, so that multiple parties can claim address
> ownership. Reference: J. Kempf, J. Wood, Z. Ramzan, C. Gentry, "IP
> Address Authorization for Secure Address Proxying using Multi-key CGAs
> and Ring Signatures", IWSEC'06.
> - Perform a threat analysis of the current dependency of CGAs with
> SHA-1 and Update CGAs so that other hash functions can be used. (this
> work is already been discussed in the Int area ml, but i guess it would
> benefit from additional discussion in a specialized forum). Reference:
> draft-bagnulo-multiple-hash-cga-01.txt
> - Define CGA extensions to support other public key algorithms. this
> would be a generic extension that would allow using other public key
> schemes in CGAs. In particular, the extension for using Elliptic Curve
> encryption have been suggested.
> - Usage of CGAs with IPSec. The goal here would be to use the key of
> the CGA to create an IPSec SA. Possible IKEv2 extensions need to be
> defined for this. Reference: draft-laganier-ike-ipv6-cga-01.txt
> - CGAs and DHCP. The goal here would be to analyze possible mechanisms
> to allow to assign CGAs using DHCP and to produce a recommendation
> about how this can be done. The actual DHCP extensions are to be
> defined in the DHC wg.
> - Define CGA extensions for including Link Layer information in the
> CGA. Reference: draft-laganier-send-ll-hba-00.txt
> - Define CGA extensions to include a certified MAC address
> - Define CGA extensions to include symmetric keys. Reference:
> draft-narayanan-pba-01.txt
>
> Other items?
>
> comments on the items above?
>
> Regards, marcelo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
>
>

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area