Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-carpenter-flow-label-balancing-02

[ Replying midway through the thread as somehow my MUA et the original…] 

On Dec 20, 2012, at 8:38 PM, Liubing (Leo) <leo.liubing@huawei.com> wrote:

> I'm in favor of it. It's a good use case of flow label for L3/4 load balancing.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> B.R.
> Bing
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: int-area-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:int-area-bounces@ietf.org] On
>> Behalf Of Suresh Krishnan
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 8:46 PM
>> To: Internet Area
>> Cc: Julien Laganier; Ralph Droms
>> Subject: [Int-area] Call for adoption of
>> draft-carpenter-flow-label-balancing-02
>> 
>> Hi all,
>>  This draft has been presented at intarea face to face meetings and has
>> received a bit of discussion. It has been difficult to gauge whether the
>> wg is interested in this work or not. This call is being initiated to
>> determine whether there is WG consensus towards adoption of
>> draft-carpenter-flow-label-balancing-02 as an intarea WG draft. Please
>> state whether or not you're in favor of the adoption by replying to this
>> email. If you are not in favor, please also state your objections in
>> your response. This adoption call will complete on 2013-01-04.

Support.

I was originally opposed to this draft (and /may/ have thrown a bit of a hissy fit at Brian about it), but my major concerns have been addressed in this version and I now support adoption…

I have a few comments / notes that I promise to ship over to the authors sometime…

W

>> 
>> Regards
>> Suresh & Julien
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Int-area mailing list
>> Int-area@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
> 

--
"Have you got any previous convictions?"

"Well, I dunno... I suppose I used to believe very firmly that a penny saved is a penny earned--"
-- Terry Pratchett