IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] MCP Hint Option

Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 28 May 2022 04:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF3EC14F749 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 May 2022 21:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.093
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.093 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GBSkyklpgwOo for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 May 2022 21:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa1-x31.google.com (mail-oa1-x31.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B001CC14F73E for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 May 2022 21:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa1-x31.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-e656032735so8083455fac.0 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 May 2022 21:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hzUrmbFJ5QjHzhqdgEvK7rZMuyYYRM9fpR01wyWHmr8=; b=gXfr/mtxfQWGlK9x3bd67dVoxr/QixtBxaWF1h0aCSbmA+dG7Whs/d7uwPnNsQG79g 2DYZ3ca5XHNJLJ91jd6PJqQxjrJRWVPDRbprqD2SntAljnWsUO88URaHxN6ueEOXCrfc KWTcBLOI8yHW3tizMzUe0uSx0ZocZ29BuelpY6k3r2GAWQHN+kEat610w1/oXzNnIeLG lOEL8QTpcoT1AP5WKeol8A8zva9VcNcQBHgDbdT1mw0RgZwBzgWJbVjYFMaOyWX9G4HU t9wScTSONfTlhPet6VZYXYzDyk76D4AgvRi7dPPgRIci5HqsG7v7DkrSN6vuXaXDmpx7 XSmw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hzUrmbFJ5QjHzhqdgEvK7rZMuyYYRM9fpR01wyWHmr8=; b=wAhLj0ZYrkUUMhmG1Iv/sUpeiUGMGB3DDHZxU3+Y5zMElLoj0ZUF5/yI54b26aB0Rx XbLaeUIIvk7KJj4Vn7yT44J+KGzCHTJOLiW2fviWCWYyJV+nu8LV6E4y+yDkT1ujpkjI CXF7crufmvOPqgEJF8+Yuf5ZfxlS8co4BihLOgo08nplDKoLn+2Dhpa4+bEQnWTqgO65 Nly3gmdNNQHS3Q+h8YjxbRn7aJPrSXkjnQX0ChyKGeA/AHR+wpfxg/3Aa0zjvKykgLZv 1MVDpBltEUVAxcDI4p7IPgP85nNvGiwBheTvya2J4RTsCLhxjuj/DrFHCO/9wN9rajC1 ymhw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531e0hm/dbGIAx/zEvOfLAsnLpm+tAvNBxyurgqDEuS3U3LPLGas K0gbeoEMoXTLFe8Xbl7Cz+UeqtVkpdqWmO/vXVPKfaORKv0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwDXp9K7tOA3eEdQolLsckGuQ1ymFPRuydxegBk5JYMK5+nPHFzKyUmmwWZSSZyuHaDER2EWyIr9iT4xjyW2r0=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:d209:b0:f2:e231:6647 with SMTP id g9-20020a056870d20900b000f2e2316647mr5324999oac.99.1653712878238; Fri, 27 May 2022 21:41:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BN6PR08MB2803879D8E27A91F265949FDE6D89@BN6PR08MB2803.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR08MB2803879D8E27A91F265949FDE6D89@BN6PR08MB2803.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
From: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 21:41:07 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMGpriVv74-NMVkUiEL4EvwzfooUd=K6nzFuJUtgpv5ZNGWM2w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Robinson, Herbie" <Herbie.Robinson@stratus.com>
Cc: "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ab009605e00b08b4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/Q3tIv99jjcV1DHucWTXsYVwwD8o>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] MCP Hint Option
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area WG Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 May 2022 04:41:22 -0000

Herbie,

Out of curiosity, can you explain more about what this sentence means:

"""
   Note that RFC8200 [RFC8200] requires that per fragment destination
   headers to be followed by a routing header.
"""

The way I read this sentence doesn't exactly agree with my understanding
of 8200.

Thanks,
-ek

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 6:47 PM Robinson, Herbie <
Herbie.Robinson@stratus.com> wrote:

> I would like to propose a small (8 page) RFC for the working group to take
> up.  This is small option that can drastically improve multi-core IPSec
> performance in some situations.
>
>
>
> draft-robinson-intarea-mcphint-00 - Multiple Core Performance Hint Option
> (ietf.org)
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-robinson-intarea-mcphint/>
>
>
>
> I have prototyped it and the prototype achieved a better than a 3x
> performance increase on the first test case I tried (haven’t had time to do
> any more testing).
>
>
>
> There are some issues at the end of the document that I would definitely
> like some feedback on.
>
>
>
> Thanks for taking a look.
>
>
>
> Also, I should mention that Stratus has applied for a patent.  Management
> has told me that it will be available free of charge.  The online patent
> disclosure should get filled in when management gets back from vacation
> (some time next month).
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email