IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] Comments on current MPvD draft.

Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> Wed, 15 November 2017 12:13 UTC

Return-Path: <tpauly@apple.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9F2127867 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 04:13:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.32
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.32 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=apple.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5LFvnaSJBenP for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 04:13:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-in1.asia.apple.com (mail-out.asia.apple.com [17.82.254.63]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2C82124D68 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 04:13:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=apple.com; s=mailout2048s; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@apple.com; t=1510748023; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-id:To:Cc:MIME-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-reply-to:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=fucSv9qCGiB91PTDRLY1RAXdFWjJtjFk7gWRSQKBDFc=; b=1OOnD27ntV+nYUjkB9phrtBWand12D0SA+bgmv2/HcEb3tUw/gvvi18vaUVOCQyi HFvkajVsEDijtetRG+gZ75mS78A5ktgL9QyxgmVASvgtVovkDcPLL+/Wr8qk0P5X yupYu+OLHI9unn3ghqsISs5oEe/Z4yLn7FsUxIyA6A9KhKQqrQggB9tNIUc1i2A9 yt9Ghifj+4vbFhIieefshN6OHcI+O3/pplTCK8il51D52rFUhFmF4EYqpi18SJ3P c6DIpHSm94rhNGrC7ozGnMpMOguFO2JyaNz5iCaKfxpZpzd80Yf1aN4KOrtr0Mhk r+m4QhjOJaN7L1vcOZXm8g==;
Received: from relay3.asia.apple.com ( [17.82.200.17]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail-in1.asia.apple.com (Apple Singapore Mail Gateway) with SMTP id 78.A2.07591.77F2C0A5; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 20:13:43 +0800 (MYT)
X-AuditID: 1152fe11-cdecd9c000001da7-45-5a0c2f778e86
Received: from sng-mmpp-sz02.asia.apple.com ( [17.84.80.27]) by relay3.asia.apple.com (Apple Singapore relay) with SMTP id E3.C5.26676.77F2C0A5; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 20:13:43 +0800 (MYT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Received: from [17.235.152.21] by sng-mmpp-sz02.asia.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.1.3.20170825 64bit (built Aug 25 2017)) with ESMTPSA id <0OZG007YQKMVC990@sng-mmpp-sz02.asia.apple.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 20:13:43 +0800 (SGT)
Sender: tpauly@apple.com
From: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <EMEW3|fac4c47fc492eccd624e4d64bac67ba3yAEBY203tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|29BA34DE-926F-44EF-A9AB-D48E1343CE41@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 20:13:42 +0800
Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>, int-area <int-area@ietf.org>
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Message-id: <0BA09844-A318-4D41-B8A5-37EE75EFDC05@apple.com>
References: <45957315-A9A2-4E11-9069-5C41C7397034@fugue.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711151159480.32099@uplift.swm.pp.se> <29BA34DE-926F-44EF-A9AB-D48E1343CE41@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|fac4c47fc492eccd624e4d64bac67ba3yAEBY203tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|29BA34DE-926F-44EF-A9AB-D48E1343CE41@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.5)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrCLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiGHRCULdcnyfKYPFkGYsbs26yWLxcupXN 4tCe52wOzB5/17l6LFnyk8nj76SHTAHMUVw2Kak5mWWpRfp2CVwZz/btYCm4y1bxoG0GWwPj BtYuRk4OCQETiT1HZ4DZQgIrmSQ2vjGDie9tP87excgFFN/BKPHw1CcmkASvgKDEj8n3WLoY OTiYBdQlpkzJhaj5zyix48Z5VpC4sICExOY9iSDlwgLmEn1Xf7GB2GwCKhLHv21gBqnnFGhn lLh0vIcRJMEioCpx5+gaFhCbWcBd4tmPR2wQtrbEk3cXWCH22khM/fgH6iCgQ/u27GEGSYgI KEu8nfefEeJqRYmHm7pYQYokBBawSbxq2sY6gVF4FpLDZyEcPgvJjgWMzKsYxXMTM3N0M/MM 9RKLMxP1EgsKclL1kvNzNzGCw/6f4A7GqQsNDzEKcDAq8fCaafBECbEmlhVX5h5ilOBgVhLh Te7njhLiTUmsrEotyo8vKs1JLT7EKM3BoiTO2xf5KVJIID2xJDU7NbUgtQgmy8TBKdXAeKx0 Iic/h6n5AbvVq3R3n5CubhIo0rx94R5LVusP1mO7ta7V6B+aPUPjoUTXocTNz4xlmznym7bN vP9hs/reT1eEsx4Zvecvf1PHKdt07c0aqxRhoeb0nOJPpZN4ox6Kv5jIGbJmq3Vi0sYavonL m1yc/ARPWPJsiNa96HCnR2OfweZDc/9nKrEUZyQaajEXFScCAKofcQV3AgAA
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrLLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiGBIgrVuuzxNl0LxSwuLGrJssFi+XbmWz OLTnOZsDs8ffda4eS5b8ZPL4O+khUwBzFJdNSmpOZllqkb5dAlfGs307WAruslU8aJvB1sC4 gbWLkZNDQsBEYm/7cfYuRi4OIYEdjBIPT31iAknwCghK/Jh8j6WLkYODWUBdYsqUXIia/4wS O26cZwWJCwtISGzekwhSLixgLtF39RcbiM0moCJx/NsGZpB6ToF2RolLx3sYQRIsAqoSd46u YQGxmQXcJZ79eMQGYWtLPHl3gRVir43E1I9/oA5aySTRt2UPM0hCREBZ4u28/4wQVytKPNzU xTqBUWAWkltnIdw6C8nYBYzMqxhFi1JzEiuN9RKLMxP1EgsKclL1kvNzNzGCAjXohOAOxg9T DQ8xCnAwKvHwmmrwRAmxJpYVV+YeYpTgYFYS4U3u544S4k1JrKxKLcqPLyrNSS0+xCjNwaIk zqsZ9SlSSCA9sSQ1OzW1ILUIJsvEwSnVwFj+0uu3esHOxJnTlrgtnTV15zft5GNfPjblRE29 dtrZalE17815klsbM3Q2JnyT1kprC71+IXlu9i/+V7c2xHNn85j5VUevuGnP//jZLD1Zw//G 9jyLEzhDlh6MSOcqMne+8W36zMnO279vUJm+8T2Tl87Uw4mnpTprywxT2kz2KkmteH7k1WQl luKMREMt5qLiRAAkc/1BUAIAAA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/TtO9HCbwhGMb6HEaImLHYXfRvvk>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Comments on current MPvD draft.
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 12:13:47 -0000


> On Nov 15, 2017, at 7:33 PM, Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
>> On 15 Nov 2017, at 11:00, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
>> 
>> On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Ted Lemon wrote:
>> 
>>> The assumption that each PvD will have its own router
>> 
>> I don't think this is the case? It's just that each PVD is in its own RA, it doesn't mean one router can't send multiple RAs, one per PVD? That's at least my understanding.
> 
> I’d made that (wrong?) assumption too.

The design is that one router would send multiple RAs, one for each PvD. If there are multiple routers, then each could be sending one or more RAs as well.

Best,
Tommy

> 
> Tim
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email