Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-ipv4-id-update-06.txt

Hi Joe,

I have reviewed the changes, and they address all of the points
I raised in earlier correspondences.

Thanks - Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: int-area-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:int-area-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Joe Touch
> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 1:32 PM
> To: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Cc: int-area@ietf.org; i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-ipv4-id-update-
> 06.txt
> 
> Hi, all,
> 
> This version includes changes to address feedback by the IESG, which
> focus on providing context on the impact of this change on existing use
> and some clarifications.
> 
> Joe
> 
> On 10/9/2012 1:21 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> >
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> >   This draft is a work item of the Internet Area Working Group Working
> Group of the IETF.
> >
> > 	Title           : Updated Specification of the IPv4 ID Field
> > 	Author(s)       : Joe Touch
> > 	Filename        : draft-ietf-intarea-ipv4-id-update-06.txt
> > 	Pages           : 18
> > 	Date            : 2012-10-09
> >
> > Abstract:
> >     The IPv4 Identification (ID) field enables fragmentation and
> >     reassembly, and as currently specified is required to be unique
> >     within the maximum lifetime for all datagrams with a given
> >     source/destination/protocol tuple. If enforced, this uniqueness
> >     requirement would limit all connections to 6.4 Mbps. Because
> >     individual connections commonly exceed this speed, it is clear that
> >     existing systems violate the current specification. This document
> >     updates the specification of the IPv4 ID field in RFC791, RFC1122,
> >     and RFC2003 to more closely reflect current practice and to more
> >     closely match IPv6 so that the field's value is defined only when a
> >     datagram is actually fragmented. It also discusses the impact of
> >     these changes on how datagrams are used.
> >
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-ipv4-id-update
> >
> > There's also a htmlized version available at:
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-intarea-ipv4-id-update-06
> >
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-intarea-ipv4-id-update-06
> >
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Int-area mailing list
> > Int-area@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area