IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] Next steps for draft-jia-intarea-internet-addressing-gap-analysis

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Fri, 01 July 2022 12:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42043C15CF3D for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 05:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gigix-net.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fePEoyvbRmY0 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 05:03:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x333.google.com (mail-wm1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::333]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E15DBC15BED0 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 05:03:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x333.google.com with SMTP id l68so1171323wml.3 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 05:03:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gigix-net.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=/Cy4C/Qhj1g7nYOudrQkY1c/rwkKcrhvKy9Xzi9VULA=; b=orHUqrH2owxwCu0PwktdGTfLmbpiDwwdAzMBxObMugPhrjunmHWTEFiDuY+JMzkK2U 3+K+ZYo6yLEALwCI5job7WCGVkXepHJoRlM9AXefv7M3MN9hDbXogsrpZZeIx7q5/7rd DHXvjb+yHzWiPqRPF3S0RiHSFHSiHpfwIF0NuuNYIIDIIEvVCrWskmSfzBXUMFzQvRoC w8x6KfHnksBCgCIMHiha8J0cjFy86GcUsSvF7Vi9T/q4yZtmzh9LqXoKsWCWzBTkBuSg OWh/AlUqA3i4BURtgROGv1QDC+c8ZOGVTqlopYx1CbtCtV7xJtf+reHP9uIFal4zMd60 9hiA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to :in-reply-to:message-id; bh=/Cy4C/Qhj1g7nYOudrQkY1c/rwkKcrhvKy9Xzi9VULA=; b=5XcqVydc6MA/vfCns/3VzuxQEF4eAglSsdGriSyn6y3LtpTjcFRdUUIE602uirjbz1 rg6+dNNQbckGctp0S5qxES/rPEEUItIHAKelh4XNJmvsG1SKoPSei2ptKmmQp5J8Z9b/ Nfi5TfhFWh0xQzmj44zNK1+VIfTDDGQLNgzJ9q1vIe9VJG8GtlZ9KJdW6tlELoSC6LOS OabaDXa4DZMuciTrifFky8W2bcX1jC0Ti7rSQ/gFORWZIFzhYO6vUvuFUfT/tHFG8WZz AVhO01hYChkC8RblyoM/EURipq11z8UQkFqtsdJDKsRSwmrDkedvd2SRKmk97P0Tthvx mh0A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9ckYbMDNywAwP3kLXWf/ANxIVlBsj3xWerYjRSoitiRtbZA8y6 19X9dFnifUQO71YmbCbTfJhgqw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1uO8IeL5hbMNyMvWTDiUuXyGu4AwQIPorWFrH5iTB4YbJGAu5GJb7GxQIqBzeJ5W5hN04QWXw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:354c:b0:39c:7e86:6ff5 with SMTP id i12-20020a05600c354c00b0039c7e866ff5mr17115734wmq.145.1656676994519; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 05:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([37.173.143.252]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 13-20020a05600c020d00b0039c362311d2sm7172762wmi.9.2022.07.01.05.03.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Jul 2022 05:03:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3D9F56A1-739D-418D-A19B-7B2AFAC049BE"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.100.31\))
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2022 14:03:11 +0200
References: <SJ0PR11MB5769E5FC28516C3EEFCB26F9D1B29@SJ0PR11MB5769.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <ca37c109b6d14067a0c672db20413202@huawei.com> <ea2b6ce1e43a496ebf97ad713a2cbd28@huawei.com>
To: Juan Carlos Zuniga <juzuniga@cisco.com>, Wassim Haddad <wassim.haddad@ericsson.com>, "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>, int-area <int-area@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <ea2b6ce1e43a496ebf97ad713a2cbd28@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <3E6BD98B-1EE3-4068-A4CC-41E54295046D@gigix.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.100.31)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/WeODR0eI9x1P0UYzqglPPbPFYFE>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Next steps for draft-jia-intarea-internet-addressing-gap-analysis
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area WG Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2022 12:03:21 -0000

 
Hi Juan-Carlos, Wassim,
 
Thanks for your email.
 
The purpose of the two drafts about addressing is, in a first step, to document what is the state of IP addressing, i.e. how addresses are used vs what are the needs (driven by use cases), with the ultimate goal of open discussion to identify possible evolution directions. As such the intention is to continue the discussion beyond these two documents, exactly to identify how addressing should/may evolve.
There is no solution at this stage and is anyway a bit early to tackle this topic.
 
It is my understanding that such, more long term, activity is beyond the INTAREA WG charter, so we need to think a bit what is the best way forward.
I would like to ask anyway for a small presentation slot at IETF 114, to present the updates and make a point on the next steps.
 
Does it sound ok for you?
 
As for the name of the gap analysis document, using the word “problems” is in conflict with the problem statement document.
The word “issues” is also a bit strong, since current addressing model did a fine job so far, question is how to make it evolve along the emerging use cases.
What about “considerations”?    
 
Ciao
 
Luigi
 
From: Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga) <juzuniga@cisco.com <mailto:juzuniga@cisco.com>> 
Sent: Wednesday, 22 June 2022 21:16
To: Luigi IANNONE <luigi.iannone@huawei.com <mailto:luigi.iannone@huawei.com>>; jiayihao@huawei.com <mailto:jiayihao@huawei.com>
Cc: Wassim Haddad <wassim.haddad@ericsson.com <mailto:wassim.haddad@ericsson.com>>; Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com <mailto:evyncke@cisco.com>>; int-area@ietf.org <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
Subject: Next steps for draft-jia-intarea-internet-addressing-gap-analysis
 
Hi Luigi, Yihao, et al.
 
Under the context of your request for a call for adoption for draft-jia-intarea-internet-addressing-gap-analysis-02, after discussing with our AD (Éric), we would like to know:
 
·      Is the purpose of the draft to have a one shot informational/academic publication?
·      Is the intention to propose solutions beyond the current work and examples that are mentioned in the draft?
 
Also, you may want to consider changing “gaps” by “issues” or “problems.”
 
Please let us and the WG know your views so that we can take the next steps accordingly.
 
Best,
 
Juan-Carlos & Wassim
(IntArea WG chairs)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email