Re: [Int-area] Int Area Interim Meeting?

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 02 April 2020 16:52 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AABCE3A07FA for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 09:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.669
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a_fC3oDoT7KD for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 09:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B16D3A07F7 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 09:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 032GqBEK040568 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 18:52:11 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FB6F20A4BB for <int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 18:52:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6407C20A4AC for <int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 18:52:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.11.241.61] ([10.11.241.61]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 032GqAEj026992 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 18:52:10 +0200
To: int-area@ietf.org
References: <EB04C53F-2BF6-47E2-8ACA-8B5B89E0B101@gmail.com> <A30528EA-E49D-42C4-9182-DFD294703D5D@ericsson.com> <B5E89AE5-B157-47A2-9696-5877B3E34850@gmail.com> <VI1PR08MB3999B6C0C1099A62F784B7C089C60@VI1PR08MB3999.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <56134467-5873-aa14-4464-ada311a77e34@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 18:52:10 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR08MB3999B6C0C1099A62F784B7C089C60@VI1PR08MB3999.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/ZvkSi_woPUcPhTG63ngxKC2hfkA>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Int Area Interim Meeting?
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 16:52:15 -0000

Hi,
Please allow me to intervene.

I have several signs (e.g. motorshow of September cancelled, among other 
public signs) that make me think there wont be an IETF108 f2f in Madrid.

As such, I think it would be appropriate to propose a date for a virtual 
interim, maybe in July(?)

Ideally, one should have a meeting continuity plan, that tells how we 
should continue intarea WG meetings, facing unexpected events of today's 
interconnected and interdependent world.  Such a plan should be made at 
IETF level.  IT should be a public plan, not a secret plan.

We should not be indulging - again - in a mode where we simply react.

If we cant get to make an IETF meeting continuity plan, then maybe we 
can run a doodle to select a date for a meeting of intarea WG.

Or we can discuss about what makes one think there _will_ be an IETF108 
in Madrid?  What signs does one have to support that supposition?

Alex, LF/HF 1

Le 02/04/2020 à 17:44, Juan Carlos Zuniga a écrit :
> Hi Bob,
> 
> No, we have decided to cancel IntArea WG for IETF107.
> 
> We will be sending details about the next meeting once we know more 
> details about IETF108.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Juan Carlos & Wassim
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 28, 2020 11:38
> *To:* Wassim Haddad
> *Cc:* Bob Hinden; int-area; intarea-chairs@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Int-area] Int Area Interim Meeting?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
>