Re: [Int-area] Int Area Interim Meeting?

[Alexandre Petrescu <[e-mail]>]

Hi,
Please allow me to intervene.

I have several signs (e.g. motorshow of September cancelled, among other 
public signs) that make me think there wont be an IETF108 f2f in Madrid.

As such, I think it would be appropriate to propose a date for a virtual 
interim, maybe in July(?)

Ideally, one should have a meeting continuity plan, that tells how we 
should continue intarea WG meetings, facing unexpected events of today's 
interconnected and interdependent world.  Such a plan should be made at 
IETF level.  IT should be a public plan, not a secret plan.

We should not be indulging - again - in a mode where we simply react.

If we cant get to make an IETF meeting continuity plan, then maybe we 
can run a doodle to select a date for a meeting of intarea WG.

Or we can discuss about what makes one think there _will_ be an IETF108 
in Madrid?  What signs does one have to support that supposition?

Alex, LF/HF 1

Le 02/04/2020 à 17:44, Juan Carlos Zuniga a écrit :
> Hi Bob,
> 
> No, we have decided to cancel IntArea WG for IETF107.
> 
> We will be sending details about the next meeting once we know more 
> details about IETF108.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Juan Carlos & Wassim
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Bob Hinden <[e-mail]>
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 28, 2020 11:38
> *To:* Wassim Haddad
> *Cc:* Bob Hinden; int-area; [e-mail]
> *Subject:* Re: [Int-area] Int Area Interim Meeting?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
>