IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6

"Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Fri, 08 May 2015 18:03 UTC

Return-Path: <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CACF1B2E0D for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2015 11:03:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DPUGeVqFexoW for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2015 11:03:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blv-mbsout-02.boeing.com (blv-mbsout-02.boeing.com [130.76.32.232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B34491B2E16 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 May 2015 11:03:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blv-mbsout-02.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with SMTP id t48I3EB4002225; Fri, 8 May 2015 11:03:15 -0700
Received: from XCH-BLV-202.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-blv-202.nw.nos.boeing.com [10.57.37.69]) by blv-mbsout-02.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id t48I3B90002205 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=OK); Fri, 8 May 2015 11:03:11 -0700
Received: from XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com ([169.254.4.120]) by XCH-BLV-202.nw.nos.boeing.com ([169.254.2.165]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Fri, 8 May 2015 11:03:10 -0700
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>, "Zuniga, Juan Carlos" <JuanCarlos.Zuniga@InterDigital.com>
Thread-Topic: [Int-area] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6
Thread-Index: AdCJioTEgkhcUI1nR+KSNKB9h8DeVgAKaW+gAAD7IQAAACnn8A==
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 18:03:10 +0000
Message-ID: <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832E5D849@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <CY1PR05MB1994ECC837710E986C900AC5AEDE0@CY1PR05MB1994.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832E5D7FC@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CY1PR05MB19949E660F283CC378DEFA51AEDE0@CY1PR05MB1994.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CY1PR05MB19949E660F283CC378DEFA51AEDE0@CY1PR05MB1994.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [130.247.104.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/_IasKFV87IrL6wS3EsecfVKNVa8>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 18:03:17 -0000

Hi Ron,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ronald Bonica [mailto:rbonica@juniper.net]
> Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 10:55 AM
> To: Templin, Fred L; int-area@ietf.org; Zuniga, Juan Carlos
> Subject: RE: [Int-area] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6
> 
> 
> Please see http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/int-area/current/msg04521.html

I don't see how you can just say "out of scope" to something that is prone
to operational ambiguity and call it good. There needs to at least be a
discussion about the challenges of probing in the presence of ECMP/LAG.

Thanks - Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com

>                                                              Ron
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Templin, Fred L [mailto:Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com]
> > Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 1:34 PM
> > To: Ronald Bonica; int-area@ietf.org; Zuniga, Juan Carlos
> > Subject: RE: [Int-area] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6
> >
> > I am not satisfied yet that the tunnel ingress can ensure that probe packets
> > take the same path as all data packets. With ECMP, it is possible that probes
> > take path A with a sufficient MTU while some data packets take path B with
> > insufficient MTU. If the authors know some way of ensuring that probes will
> > take the same path as all data packets then it needs to be documented in the
> > spec.
> >
> > Thanks - Fred
> > fred.l.templin@boeing.com
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Int-area [mailto:int-area-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ronald
> > > Bonica
> > > Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 5:29 AM
> > > To: int-area@ietf.org; Zuniga, Juan Carlos
> > > Subject: Re: [Int-area] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6
> > >
> > > Juan Carlos,
> > >
> > > Thank you very much!
> > >
> > > Version 7 of the draft, posted on April 13, addresses all issue gathered from
> > the WG Last Call.
> > >
> > >
> > > Ron
> > >
> > > > Authors,
> > > >
> > > > The WGLC has ended. Please produce a new version of the document
> > > > taking into account the comments received on the lists and submit a
> > > > summary of the different issues addressed in this new version.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > >
> > > > Juan Carlos
> > > > (as Int-Area WG co-chair)
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Int-area mailing list
> > > Int-area@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email