[Int-area] PVLAN deployment?
Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org> Thu, 09 July 2015 10:37 UTC
Return-Path: <nordmark@acm.org>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BFAE1AD069 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 03:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.935
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.935 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mbNhMVfjqjfP for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 03:37:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c.mail.sonic.net (c.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2F4F1AD061 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 03:37:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.22.239.151] ([162.210.130.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by c.mail.sonic.net (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t69AbdwQ025638 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 9 Jul 2015 03:37:41 -0700
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>, Internet Area <int-area@ietf.org>
From: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>
Message-ID: <559E4EF3.3050509@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 12:37:39 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVZQOIKLpG2lMXgdn/6GaPpbnM/LCbzI/LQcMy/2LoVx4GnhCLkNxHbdBRcrnNIMY2XWQEHD9BTZv3Cmu78aYFJY
X-Sonic-ID: C;DvfDhSYm5RGg7YM848vClw== M;uCWfhiYm5RGg7YM848vClw==
X-Sonic-Spam-Details: 0.0/5.0 by cerberusd
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/aMe4RmlTuh1CxzI1G_H0qC1-iNI>
Subject: [Int-area] PVLAN deployment?
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:37:48 -0000
Mikael,
In the Int-Area meeting in Dallas you said that there is IPv6 deployment
over Private VLANs (for DSL? Fibre?) in Sweden.
Do you know whether that uses redundant routers?
As I worked out some details for draft-nordmark-intarea-ippl one of they
key questions is around how folks already handle dual routers, and
whether the routers handle link-local destinations.
Also, whether folks have deployed proxy DAD (RFC6957) or are skipping DAD.
Is there a way to find out more about this deployment?
Erik
- [Int-area] PVLAN deployment? Erik Nordmark