Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies
<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Mon, 23 April 2018 05:32 UTC
Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450881273B1 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 22:32:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DJaOu2ugS8LQ for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 22:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from orange.com (mta135.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.70.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77DE6120227 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 22:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr07.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.71]) by opfednr27.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 0B165A051D; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 07:32:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.34]) by opfednr07.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id DD1301C0066; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 07:32:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::60a9:abc3:86e6:2541]) by OPEXCLILM6F.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::bd00:88f8:8552:3349%17]) with mapi id 14.03.0389.001; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 07:32:26 +0200
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies
Thread-Index: AQHT2Y06zyeX5t1Qrk25w16U97YsZqQN0sHg
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 05:32:25 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302DF0F8FE@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <a231b336-7e6d-bef1-92ab-001ae05eef0c@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <a231b336-7e6d-bef1-92ab-001ae05eef0c@cs.tcd.ie>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/dFt11GyQHR5vLvbKkdUTLTZypUQ>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 05:32:31 -0000
Hi Stephen, The scope of this document is aligned with what the IETF has published in the past in this field. A list is provided below: 1. Identify logging as an issue in address sharing: RFC 6269 2. Require address sharing to enable a logging function: RFC 6269 and RFC 6888 3. Identify a minimal set of information to be logged: RFC 6269, RFC 6888, and RFC 6908 4. Identify and discuss trade-offs of solutions to achieve logging: RFC 6269, RFC 6908 5. Specify means to optimize logging (port range allocation, deterministic NAT): draft-ietf-softwire-stateless- 4v6-motivation, RFC 7596, RFC 7597, RFC 7599, RFC 7753, and RFC7422 6. Recommend servers to log source port: RFC 6302 7. An initial survey of servers supporting source port logging: RFC 7768 (ISE) 8. Retrieve NAT session loggings: draft-ietf-behave-syslog-nat- logging, RFC 8158 9. CPU and memory issues: RFC 6908 As such, this I-D: - **DOES NOT** define a new behavior: it relies on existing IETF RFCs. - **DOES NOT** require logging another yet information: again, it relies on the various schemes discussed in existing RFCs. The I-D inherits the same privacy implications of existing RFCs. Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Int-area [mailto:int-area-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Stephen > Farrell > Envoyé : samedi 21 avril 2018 18:24 > À : int-area@ietf.org > Objet : [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal > Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies > > > Hiya, > > I've read this draft and do not support adoption of a > draft with this scope. > > I do support consideration of how law enforcement > investigations can be carried out, but not without a > similar level of consideration of the real trade-offs > between assisting law enforcement and commercial or > other surveillance. At present, the draft is nowhere > near sufficient in this respect. (Despite saying that > "Clearly a balance needs to be struck between individual > right to privacy and law enforcement access to data > during criminal investigations" the draft is anything > but balanced in that respect.) > > I don't think that this problem is a thing that'd be > reasonable to try fix after WG adoption, but needs to be > handled beforehand as it's a fundamental scope issue. > > In other words, I believe this draft just has the wrong > scope, and if adopted would be likely quite controversial > before publication. In contrast, a draft that really does > consider the trade-offs related to logging could be quite > valuable and if it provided a balanced approach might even > not be controversial. > > (FWIW, I might be willing to try help out a bit on a draft > that did have what I think is an appropriate scope, as I do > think more appropriate logging is a reasonable goal. But > before accepting that offer be aware that IMO sometimes > "more appropriate" ought mean only logging minimal data for > a very short period and then thoroughly scrubbing all of > that:-) > > Separately, if a document on this topic is to be adopted > by any IETF WG, I think the adoption call ought be widely > circulated (esp to saag, and art-area lists) as this is a > topic that is likely to attract interest from various folks > in other areas, and it'd be much better to figure out early > and not late if others also see problems with this draft. > > Cheers, > S. > > PS: I'm not subscribed to the int-area list so please do > cc' me on any follow ups. > >
- [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of Info… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Tom Herbert
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Amelia Andersdotter
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Amelia Andersdotter
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Amelia Andersdotter
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Christian Huitema
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Amelia Andersdotter
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Tom Herbert
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Amelia Andersdotter
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Povl H. Pedersen
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Povl H. Pedersen
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Povl H. Pedersen
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Amelia Andersdotter
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Amelia Andersdotter
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Amelia Andersdotter
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Amelia Andersdotter
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Amelia Andersdotter
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Amelia Andersdotter
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Amelia Andersdotter
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Amelia Andersdotter
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Amelia Andersdotter
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Juan Carlos Zuniga
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Linus Lüssing
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Ted Lemon
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of … Dave O'Reilly