IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] Comment on draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-02

Erik Kline <ek@loon.co> Tue, 13 November 2018 19:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ek@google.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26705128B14 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:36:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.252
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.252 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=loon.co
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rUuCyfEivDwa for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:36:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it1-x131.google.com (mail-it1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B9BB128CB7 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:36:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it1-x131.google.com with SMTP id j79-v6so20292466itb.2 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:36:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=loon.co; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=f3U8fKqZOaDqDL+lu8CcM/+0FKQbHw0m1REUR8+4E3U=; b=PpY4CR4YO0e4tXVOj1BZxvNtGyjbWWnPeTRQvjLjlfCzO++T/tozPKZvBdTYHzCBXC DgXP6XY+NnRz3alcfKGBTBTfczmGIfLZlDZhhKZOIVcJq/WlqXwHNZRlIpYbYGh7RFAZ DjIENApI1H2QJoieGuHeNpeqpvi/VnEwXrKCo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=f3U8fKqZOaDqDL+lu8CcM/+0FKQbHw0m1REUR8+4E3U=; b=cjCGDrd9nBSOo5/oq7WMOJ9ZFkGAe+/AjISog9Igw1kAUvm+6HiMOfPOTTbkHBwWik w4WqrFn7UmLhfUS8EO58kSmKTdsmhEB/k9JWIQ2eQlQ7JILnw/4yAM+2NzyokkPXy+Yt WtQPbAo7v68SNM747kyBeprpwKZcW2ZPBXDsmhgx29tuXSyv9xiAAzaBOD0+bgXl3pXT fFroorwF+qceOruGfX+WkRnf3ZCndMFblYKIFZHNIsQ/fxffpcvYtc9F/NolzryJsodq hQcDcMeko7ZiW0VaLAsnjcOoH8V787SKWY4dZGHiiI5Wbh3YkHZaGZkI5FWAsXEjrwvo idcQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gKRadI6IrsgoSuGctra7jz+xSZm5+iRZg8fzWxY6i6quDllCVHF DA+SkUImGF3qUaji2aI/9rkF0A3bE+40NzbaBfsluQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5deSiHgw7gI/1C4BJo5zqycE3LfaX5z5Y+Lx9OWzPvOV8iJBPpqtrb4BhGGFIlqURJpTojSqvOl8klO64zZVFY=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:9795:: with SMTP id s21-v6mr5840542jaj.92.1542137788862; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:36:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BYAPR05MB4245CFB9117EF11735EE1F91AEC10@BYAPR05MB4245.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR05MB4245CFB9117EF11735EE1F91AEC10@BYAPR05MB4245.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Reply-To: ek@loon.co
From: Erik Kline <ek@loon.co>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:36:12 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAedzxpHUOVURKhDV-j9CDDAAkPJTFaX8XEmHPh3+ODgTcMfhA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Cc: Internet Area <int-area@ietf.org>, Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/gg7pRselOdZFKBVrNt2Q1J1rsjI>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Comment on draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-02
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 19:36:32 -0000

Ron,

Related to this section, at the mic I was suggesting perhaps including
some simple text recommending that network operators SHOULD take
efforts to make sure the MTU(s) on their network(s) are "fit for
purpose", i.e. sized to avoid fragmentation to the extent possible.

I'm not sure yet how to better express that notion.  It seems obvious
and anodyne, but it can be useful to have these things captured for
reference by non-IETF documents.
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 at 09:18, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> wrote:
>
> Jen,
>
> This is a good idea. I will add it to the next draft version.
>
>                                                   Ron
>
>
> > recommends that operators do not filter ICMPv6 PTB. I believe it would be
> > beneficial to make an explicit recommendation to permit fragmented packets
> > to/from operator's DNS servers.
> > I apologia if it's been discussed before and rejected (I did not find such
> > discussion on the list).
> >
> **********************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email