Re: [Int-area] Name based sockets
Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Fri, 06 August 2010 17:15 UTC
Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: int-area@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F0A3A6A0E for <int-area@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:15:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bF8dZFPsuUlF for <int-area@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:15:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788963A69A3 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [75.217.108.71] (71.sub-75-217-108.myvzw.com [75.217.108.71]) (authenticated bits=0) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o76HE9c9005320 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C5C42E0.30201@isi.edu>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:14:08 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alex Burr <ajb44.geo@yahoo.com>
References: <53658.19504.qm@web35603.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <53658.19504.qm@web35603.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: int-area@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Name based sockets
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/int-area>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 17:15:54 -0000
On 8/2/2010 9:37 AM, Alex Burr wrote: > [cc'd to int-area, but since I'm not subscribed it may not get through there] > > Javier, > This looks very interesting. Maybe I'm missing something, but from an API > perspective, if you are going to the trouble of abstracting the address from the > application by making it a name, it seems anomalous to leave the port as a > number. Have you thought about making the port a name too? See: http://www.isi.edu/touch/pubs/draft-touch-tcp-portnames-00.txt Joe
- [Int-area] Name based sockets Alex Burr
- [Int-area] Name based sockets Javier Ubillos
- Re: [Int-area] Name based sockets Laganier, Julien
- Re: [Int-area] Name based sockets Javier Ubillos
- Re: [Int-area] Name based sockets Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Int-area] Name based sockets Joe Touch