Re: [Int-area] ACTION REQUIRED: Extending working group last call for draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-02

[Joe Touch <[e-mail]>]

BTW, the MAP doc cites RFC 6145, which has errors as follows:

1. it sets IPv4 ID=0 when IPv6 lacks a frag header
     that will hopefully be possible after ipv4-id-update is final,
     but wasn't valid a the time the doc was published

2. copying the low 16 bits of the IPv6 ID field to the IPv4 ID field is 
invalid
     that field might not follow the ID uniqueness criteria of IPv4

3. the system assumes IPv4 can reassemble 1280 byte packets
     but only 576 can be assumed

I've brought these to the attention of the authors...

Joe

On 7/2/2012 1:36 PM, Dan Wing wrote:
> I support draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis going forward.
>
> I would like the draft to include a citation of MAP
> (draft-ietf-softwire-map), and mention MAP in its abstract.  This is because
> many technologists assume address sharing only occurs with NAT, even though
> it occurs with a bunch of other technologies.  On this point, I noticed
> "application proxies" is mentioned in the abstract (which is good), but
> application proxies are not mentioned again in the introduction to
> draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis nor mentioned in RFC6269 ("Issues
> with IP Address Sharing").
>
> -d
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On
>> Behalf Of Suresh Krishnan
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 8:57 AM
>> To: Internet Area
>> Subject: [Int-area] ACTION REQUIRED: Extending working group last call
>> for draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-02
>>
>> Hi all,
>>    The WGLC on this draft ended with no comments at all. In this
>> context,
>> we cannot assume that silence equates to consent. In order for this
>> draft to progress, we need people to read the draft and provide their
>> opinions on whether the draft is ready. To enable people to comment,
>> the
>> last call period is extended until Friday July 6, 2012.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Suresh and Julien
>>
>> On 06/08/2012 10:06 AM, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>    This message starts a two week intarea working group last call on
>>> advancing the draft about Analysis of Solution Candidates to Reveal a
>>> Host Identifier (HOST_ID) in Shared Address Deployments as an
>>> Informational RFC. The draft is available at
>>>
>>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-02.txt
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-02
>>>
>>> Substantive comments and statements of support/opposition for
>> advancing
>>> this document should be directed to the mailing list. Editorial
>>> suggestions can be sent directly to the authors. This last call will
>>> conclude on June 22, 2012.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Suresh & Julien
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Int-area mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Int-area mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
>
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
>