[Int-area] draft-learmonth-intarea-rfc1226-bis-00

"Iain R. Learmonth" <irl@hambsd.org> Thu, 21 May 2020 07:25 UTC

Return-Path: <irl@hambsd.org>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38CD3A0A85 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2020 00:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.118
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.118 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zW2t3uXoFcfY for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2020 00:25:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72C183A0A8B for <Int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 May 2020 00:25:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bell.riseup.net (bell-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49SLk31bdxzFfwn for <Int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 May 2020 00:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Riseup-User-ID: 0F4898CA4371C89A554FAC1181C59DAB48B00E7D64E0AD90FF739A0418C0B1EF
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bell.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49SLk25XHqzJr8b for <Int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 May 2020 00:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
References: <159004528499.11433.5479167060208316355@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Int-area@ietf.org
From: "Iain R. Learmonth" <irl@hambsd.org>
Organization: HamBSD Project
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <159004528499.11433.5479167060208316355@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <90e3bce1-cd60-b45b-d4d9-11da99ee2093@hambsd.org>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 08:25:11 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <159004528499.11433.5479167060208316355@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/vJuasM7XupGs1ao7gGihZMfyNwI>
Subject: [Int-area] draft-learmonth-intarea-rfc1226-bis-00
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 07:27:04 -0000

Hi All,

I have just submitted a draft containing a refresh for RFC1226, "AX.25
over IP".

URL:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-learmonth-intarea-rfc1226-bis-00.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-learmonth-intarea-rfc1226-bis/
Htmlized:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-learmonth-intarea-rfc1226-bis-00
Htmlized:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-learmonth-intarea-rfc1226-bis

I am happy to receive any comments you may have. This draft has been
discussed within the TAPR APRSSIG mailing list, and that thread can be
found here:

http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/2020-May/048579.html

I plan to survey existing implementations to see whether or not they are
currently interoperable, and will be producing an implementation for
HamBSD (https://hambsd.org/).

Currently this is specified for unicast IP, however I can see benefits
to enabling multicast use. I would like to have multicast use covered in
this update.

There is also the question of UDP encapsulated AX.25 which currently
seems to have been made up by every implementation. I will include that
in my survey, and see if there can be some consensus drawn there. I'm
not sure if it is appropriate to add the UDP encapsulation details to
this draft, or if it would be preferred to make that a separate draft,
maybe even in a different area/WG.

Thanks,
Iain.


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-learmonth-intarea-rfc1226-bis-00.txt
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 00:14:45 -0700
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: Iain Learmonth <irl@hambsd.org>rg>, Iain R. Learmonth <irl@hambsd.org>


A new version of I-D, draft-learmonth-intarea-rfc1226-bis-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Iain R. Learmonth and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:		draft-learmonth-intarea-rfc1226-bis
Revision:	00
Title:		Internet Protocol Encapsulation of AX.25 Frames
Document date:	2020-05-21
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		6



Abstract:
   This document describes a method for the encapsulation of AX.25 Link
   Access Protocol for Amateur Packet Radio frames within IPv4 and IPv6
   packets.  Obsoletes RFC1226.

Note

   Comments are solicited and should be addressed to the author(s).

   The sources for this draft are at:

   https://github.com/irl/draft-rfc1226-bis




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat