[Int-area] New version of draft-bormann-intarea-alfi
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 09 September 2013 20:22 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E744521F9FC6 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 13:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1oFBMH953-+y for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 13:22:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEBED21F9FBE for <int-area@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 13:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r89KMC9Z009604 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 22:22:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.217.105] (p54893FE2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.137.63.226]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 68E719B9; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 22:22:12 +0200 (CEST)
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 22:22:11 +0200
To: "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <A1B43C2F-F80F-48DE-AF3A-0AA8C97496D0@tzi.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Subject: [Int-area] New version of draft-bormann-intarea-alfi
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/int-area>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 20:22:29 -0000
I just submitted a re-spin of draft-bormann-intarea-alfi. Apart from typos, the major difference is that the abstract now explicitly says: The present specification defines two alternative mechanisms [...] One design is based on the the IPv6 design and probably doesn't work on the Internet. The other design goes strictly against the IPv6 design and probably works well on the Internet. Maybe we can find some time in Vancouver to discuss this aspect of the draft. Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bormann-intarea-alfi-04 Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-bormann-intarea-alfi-04 Grüße, Carsten
- [Int-area] New version of draft-bormann-intarea-a… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Int-area] New version of draft-bormann-intar… Templin, Fred L