[Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6man-sids-05

Juan-Carlos Zúñiga via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 30 January 2024 22:10 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED547C151520; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:10:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Juan-Carlos Zúñiga via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: int-dir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-6man-sids.all@ietf.org, ipv6@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.4.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <170665263695.6671.7381361263530780599@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Juan-Carlos Zúñiga <juzuniga@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:10:36 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/0Wnl4MSHap7iHNk0L66aGtYqQ9g>
Subject: [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6man-sids-05
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 22:10:37 -0000

Reviewer: Juan-Carlos Zúñiga
Review result: Ready with Nits

Reviewer: Juan Carlos Zuniga
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for <draft-ietf-6man-sids>. These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors.
Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they
would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along
with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on
the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/.

Based on my review, if I were on the IESG I would ballot this document as NO
OBJECTION.

Summary: The document is intended to explain the use of SRv6 SIDs within 
the IPv6 Addressing Architecture.

Major issues: None.

Minor issues:

Abstract/Introduction:
The Abstract mentions briefly that the document allocates a Global Unicast
Prefix for SIDs. This is not mentioned in the Introduction though. Since this is 
a major contribution of the document, I suggest adding some more text in the 
Introduction about the usefulness of this allocation.

Best, 

Juan Carlos