IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-dir] [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip-10

"touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com> Thu, 20 April 2023 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088C1C14068D; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 11:28:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.315
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.315 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WvT1H4lIrLc5; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 11:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-2.web-hosting.com (server217-2.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D5CBC1595FE; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 11:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=qELgCp4IcyFL+gWVrvJO8xKyPVpiEQSPA6V/94ugKWw=; b=0ydPx6/sOtcRDqlmpjb9N5+R+R 3exLliJp1VJlfhnYLU43oykPsG0F1upJkCvWE015GsG01cqv1dlnA5GIiG7sQFB46J+iEscuj4l2C hBxRQxGoVSNmJVLiJ/kPCJ5oalIkDj+eIRzS9PheMH95LaOEvcCWqvfcL6F83Xh7RppldWSxMLerq OsMFBhxRLtZSMix9ojVkdY2B66n7h/HUfBFCZcBYTQp3dGHsFHLAf6s6w2hHFwPrVmJriYtvIBivS CMHpeYuV0tWzdYgwc+aVXhRzuP+MTjtYQLcfnejr8H60eAC6nZvN4L4Skd8y27/Gc1X5f/SpIblLD tkIL7+iA==;
Received: from [172.58.208.248] (port=1559 helo=smtpclient.apple) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1ppZ0k-009t6L-BJ; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 14:28:06 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D66BA8BB-46B4-47EA-9243-BB9F7AF9CF98"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.500.231\))
From: "touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPDSy+7Lr=tqdVF+PPizLsSCXheRsLUfAVx9GyzpPySo791Ztg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 11:27:50 -0700
Cc: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, "int-dir@ietf.org" <int-dir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "masque@ietf.org" <masque@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <19845D9D-97BB-4080-BC96-2E8E6F693EB5@strayalpha.com>
References: <168152936276.58402.12408511926010382248@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAPDSy+5ZOnK02VgJY7giVD0uNM4ao7-gHXUhrf6BG9RWxzC+RQ@mail.gmail.com> <19AB5170-D789-491C-B748-7AD5CE26B58C@strayalpha.com> <DU0PR07MB8970FC2DDE02B2BBB78D6E33959D9@DU0PR07MB8970.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAPDSy+72wpWzsQur=Bsvf7bUAxCAzq=OnXDS6Uxr7-k-3ZS-0Q@mail.gmail.com> <DA3F26DF-5B5F-4045-AA67-2BDEDCCA7975@strayalpha.com> <CAPDSy+7cf=ONtQw4Sfy4u51i6txk9K7axhyz6nx=_vic35DWtQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F486987-90BB-480A-9A0E-2E09BC4F1B72@strayalpha.com> <CAPDSy+7+TykbJpa56ysQpdHt3B=ei_oCFzOy7T7Sqx=dp9YADQ@mail.gmail.com> <930DECBA-D4DF-4379-A296-A6B6BAAB8A98@strayalpha.com> <41E77484-6685-420F-ADCA-0313331B02FA@strayalpha.com> <CAPDSy+7Lr=tqdVF+PPizLsSCXheRsLUfAVx9GyzpPySo791Ztg@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.500.231)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/7uOjMnVyql9dw9EuRfkxeroCJGA>
Subject: Re: [Int-dir] [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip-10
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 18:28:17 -0000

Hi, David,

I’m fine with how the congestion control issue has been resolved.

I think the doc should include some discussion of how it would be used, which can include a router bundled with implementations.

However, my advice to the INTAREA ADs is that router functions must not be included *as part of the tunnel spec*. I don’t want to have to add this to draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels as a counterexample or with updates.

Joe

—
Dr. Joe Touch, temporal epistemologist
www.strayalpha.com

> On Apr 20, 2023, at 10:26 AM, David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Joe,
> 
> Thank you for the very productive discussion around this draft. We've landed the majority of your feedback as changes into the document that are reflected in draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip-12. However, there remain two points:
> 1) inclusion of text that applies to routers that we see as important implementer advice instead of implementation-specific advice about TUN interfaces
> 2) whether disabling congestion control is a MAY or a SHOULD
> And for those, we're going to have to agree to disagree. The conversation was definitely interesting, but at this point I don't think we'll reach agreement on them.
> 
> Thanks,
> David

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email