[Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-11
Ralf Weber <ralf.weber@nominum.com> Mon, 12 December 2016 12:34 UTC
Return-Path: <Ralf.Weber@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879DD129A7E; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 04:34:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PbeYOHoWgN9j; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 04:34:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com [64.89.234.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E95B0129A85; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 04:34:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-04.win.nominum.com [64.89.235.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0AB87406BC; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:34:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [172.19.248.88] (104.153.224.166) by CAS-04.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 04:34:18 -0800
From: Ralf Weber <ralf.weber@nominum.com>
To: draft-qin-softwire-multicast-prefix-option@tools.ietf.org
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:34:05 +0100
Message-ID: <780A2718-93AB-4304-B09C-62998D19EF2F@nominum.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5310)
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/9KCSEdfxo6LpJZZgMVTX24f5wUY>
Cc: int-ads@ietf.org, int-dir@ietf.org
Subject: [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-11
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:34:29 -0000
Moin! I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for <draft-foo.txt>. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate.html. I've read the document and see no issues with it. One minor nit that might clarify things is in section 3 when explaining option length. This is in octets while the other lengths in the option are bit mask. Might be worth spelling out. So long -Ralf
- [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-softwire-multicast… Ralf Weber
- Re: [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-softwire-multi… mohamed.boucadair