[Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-sframe-enc-07

Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 29 March 2024 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402EEC14F6A7; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 08:30:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: int-dir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-sframe-enc.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, sframe@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.9.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <171172625624.49272.18301693085107891676@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Suresh Krishnan <sureshk@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 08:30:56 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/HOQQiM3TfSBrml8-yNIUOR5zZo8>
Subject: [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-sframe-enc-07
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 15:30:56 -0000

Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
Review result: Ready with Nits

I found the document well written and easy to understand. I did have two minor
comments to bring up:

* The draft seems to have a few (looks like Python) code blocks embedded in it.
Consider enclosing them within <CODE BEGINS> and <CODE ENDS> markers to
identify them as code components for licensing purposes.

* The draft seems to refer to an obsoleted version of the SDP spec RFC4566
which was obsoleted by RFC8866. Unless there is something specific in the old
SDP needed for this draft, it probably makes sense to refer to the newer RFC.