Re: [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-07

[Jen Linkova <[e-mail]>]

On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 7:06 PM Tim Chown <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > The thing is that the host behaviour is explicitly (and intentionally)
> > out of scope. For me, as a network administrator, it doesn't matter
> > how exactly the client configures that address: my network
> > design/topology would be the same. The client can be a RFC7084-type
> > router (that's what happens when someone plugs a CPE to an access
> > port), or use smth like rfc7278 - or smth else. Up to the client, the
> > network routes thet whole prefix to that device, do whatever you want
> > with it.
>
> OK, so maybe make it clearer that it is out of scope, as I was expecting to find some comment about it, and I could not.

The last paragraph of the Introduction states that:
"This document focuses on the behaviour of the network. Host behaviour
is not defined in this document."
Do you think we need to make it more clear?

> we do frequently have campus admins asking how they get host entries into the DNS with SLAAC, so it’s a FAQ.

Yes, I agree it's a problem to solve, but I think it might be more in
scope for my 6MOPS draft...What do you think?

-- 
Cheers, Jen Linkova