Re: [Int-dir] Liaison statement received from ITU-T regarding a "Reference Model of IPv6 Addressing Plan for Internet of Things Deployment"

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 03 October 2017 17:10 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3090F134F88; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 10:10:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nQhkBIeUOPuS; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 10:09:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x229.google.com (mail-wr0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63628134F7A; Tue, 3 Oct 2017 10:09:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x229.google.com with SMTP id o44so5072924wrf.11; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 10:09:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=C/p1fQRRgDa7lJGOSMhqZ0h60vAMiOp1C+8cg9zGYGg=; b=ga74aNYXZ4561EfTF7AMuncOVJ4BbmNAAx10A+RdT08LmZMbOjJgpgfH0XvWIjQ7Zy Njnm8xo4KJE8TKXYUa8mjrKFdHuSCitAapyDhHQbC+fyO1c6v2dIHNhZVjef884HEmnb LCAWg+0gkAh4mCnCBHMpnSfTnkPqbyAaB6BGmTh6Pk4s/tB+nX7082/SnOXRHrUrP0Hv lYvBQQx0w/CFuoZvSLeCMLusXQSVjemAFh1fOLcYRLhJtofc2Ta2ox204IG9eUWzfX8I Wl5fTU4XB9PVXG27DDTClk0H2FUPGlFJ8ZeWPUTElRSA5cebQooI3CA7nPEIxS7P3qr7 ER2A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=C/p1fQRRgDa7lJGOSMhqZ0h60vAMiOp1C+8cg9zGYGg=; b=DjhPNR/4ldruOwHVrq//bVUf9YMY2auHAGo6zQIqJKtdiXW0oS7NlOFcdvEN62+dMV 5zMHcj3bOsWiSd1np1fqPureAbzKCpZ2Gh7s7buYHSv0cKOGaoRou6ugRbGCF35tTTRJ L3aV2CvQYH0cBpR1cN3c6jUtLfUsCliktERmi8jdAqrwpZpCyXhd8q0tysV/bNjYmUc6 VoGUcEYcO38pySuzARAHKd8BnUyd/PqGVpE5XGhfOFUkhIhLZUYd2Y9LlK8RHXz7VmYH 0BFE+GIn2RJ9ULTEDE0o2210tkidx2DCM0OPOWaoW901ImLCK34lEOqtg3xe3FKZ/Lpy e7eg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaUjnCKCkFyuRqnV/mPfzBp2/qRnB1C+czJUbgWT9D3dVEfXAv8G 8Ldcfqw8+JeHxnsdlwJQ89mdSIXR
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBcFOD2y8a1qmRGLDMoGwIFIxJrzWgs1Cf+jVM+pt7GZN/pIkOj1u9aeED5bjsVU3n4i3CaYw==
X-Received: by 10.223.157.74 with SMTP id o10mr7060361wre.213.1507050597649; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 10:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8802:5600:e::1ef9? ([2600:8802:5600:e::1ef9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 55sm25009972wrw.60.2017.10.03.10.09.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Oct 2017 10:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <BE1C7DF5-4520-49EB-B9C3-B49C798E13AE@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AC7519D8-F1F8-4BBC-80B7-99E42407407D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.1 \(3445.4.2\))
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 10:09:52 -0700
In-Reply-To: <EF35AFF4-B2BA-4DB1-8C3D-6614A21A535B@gmail.com>
Cc: 6lo@ietf.org, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, 6tisch@ietf.org, int-area <int-area@ietf.org>, int-dir@ietf.org, iot-dir@ietf.org, its@ietf.org, lp-wan@ietf.org, lwip@ietf.org
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
References: <EF35AFF4-B2BA-4DB1-8C3D-6614A21A535B@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.4.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/LznJ6VL9Xw5D8Fw5Ir3JWzItLBE>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 10:16:23 -0700
Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Liaison statement received from ITU-T regarding a "Reference Model of IPv6 Addressing Plan for Internet of Things Deployment"
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 17:10:01 -0000

Thanks. I would like to also get operational commentary from v6ops. Like you, when I search for the document, I come up to a paywall; the document is not openly available. Please forward either the document or the link when ITU decides to get serious about asking for comment.

A general comment: the model being followed in RFC 4861 and in the various IOT groups is fundamentally as follows. The IPv6 address consists of a prefix and an IID. In the general Internet, routing operates on prefixes, and a subnet is identified by a prefix. Within a subnet defined by WiFi, Bluetooth, IEEE 802.15.4/4g, Power Line Communication technologies, and the like, network elements generally use some form of host routing, whether source or distributed, on the presumption that topologies may be continuously changing or devices may be moving. 6LowPAN specifically has some recommendations on the structure of the address designed to minimize the actual size of an IPv6 header, and in many of them, that is treated as a lower layer problem. I'd like to believe that the work party is sufficiently clued in to not want to materially change that without discussing it with us (putting documents behind a paywall not being a great example of open discussion).

> On Oct 2, 2017, at 7:53 PM, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
>  The IETF has received a liaison statement from the ITU-T that their Study Group SG20 is inviting inputs from the IETF regarding a work item titled "Reference Model of IPv6 Addressing Plan for Internet of Things
> Deployment” and the deadline for providing inputs is 2018/01/28. The statement can be found at
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1546/
> 
> I have no further info and I am trying to get access to the referenced documents. I just want to provide a heads up while that is in process.
> 
> Thanks
> Suresh
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------