[Int-dir] Open review assignments in intdir
Carlos Bernardos via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 04 July 2022 15:38 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96621C157B4F for <int-dir@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 08:38:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Carlos Bernardos via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 8.5.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: bevolz@gmail.com, cjbc@it.uc3m.es, Carlos Bernardos <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
Message-ID: <165694913760.60047.13852622216390072967@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2022 08:38:57 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/TTdVzAMRTy6AEPtSbQHqdYM6o-w>
Subject: [Int-dir] Open review assignments in intdir
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2022 15:38:57 -0000
Hi, The following reviewers have assignments: For telechat 2022-07-14 Reviewer LC end Draft Carlos Bernardos 2022-07-08 draft-ietf-add-svcb-dns-05 David Lawrence 2022-06-21 draft-ietf-ippm-rfc8889bis-02 Timothy Winters 2022-06-21 draft-ietf-ippm-rfc8321bis-02 Suzanne Woolf 2022-07-08 draft-ietf-add-dnr-09 Juan-Carlos Zúñiga 2022-07-08 draft-ietf-add-ddr-07 Last calls: Reviewer LC end Draft Carlos Bernardos 2022-07-08 draft-ietf-add-svcb-dns-05 Ron Bonica 2022-06-08 draft-ietf-masque-connect-udp-15 Zhen Cao 2022-07-11 draft-ietf-nvo3-evpn-applicability-04 David Lamparter 2022-04-29 draft-ietf-sidrops-8210bis-10 David Lamparter 2022-02-10 draft-ietf-6man-mtu-option-15 David Lawrence 2022-03-18 draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison-04 David Lawrence 2022-06-21 draft-ietf-ippm-rfc8889bis-02 Ted Lemon 2022-04-06 draft-ietf-drip-arch-24 Benno Overeinder 2022-06-08 draft-ietf-lisp-sec-28 Timothy Winters 2022-05-19 draft-ietf-lisp-6834bis-14 Timothy Winters 2022-06-21 draft-ietf-ippm-rfc8321bis-02 Suzanne Woolf 2022-06-08 draft-ietf-masque-h3-datagram-11 Suzanne Woolf 2022-07-08 draft-ietf-add-dnr-09 Juan-Carlos Zúñiga 2022-07-08 draft-ietf-add-ddr-07 Early review requests: Reviewer Due Draft Brian Haberman 2022-07-31 draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-18 Next in the reviewer rotation: Benno Overeinder Tommy Pauly Charles Perkins Carlos Pignataro Dave Thaler Pascal Thubert Bernie Volz Ralf Weber Timothy Winters Suzanne Woolf As a helpful reference for reviewers, please check the Directorates Guidelines available at: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/iesg/wiki/DirectoratesGuidelines Reviews must include the following boilerplate text in the comments sent: "I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for <draft-foo.txt>. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>." For INT Area documents, reviewers must provide a recommendation if the document is ready to go to Last Call and therefore be forwarded to the IESG. For non-INT Area document, the reviewer must give a recommendation as to how the INT ADs are to complete the ballot on the document and the reason for that recommendation. See https://www.ietf.org/standards/process/iesg-ballots/. Comments provided MUST be in the order of significance (i.e., those issues that are serious and must be fixed (i.e., DISCUSS level issues) MUST be first). While comments on minor issues (typos, etc.) are welcome, they should be last. A template review response might be: -8-<- BEGIN TEMPLATE -8-<- I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for <draft-foo.txt>. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>. [INT Area documents] Based on my review, the document [IS, IS NOT] ready to go to IETF Last Call and therefore [CAN, CANNOT] be forwarded to the IESG [Non-INT Area documents] Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot this document as [YES, NO OBJECTION, DISCUSS, RETURN TO WG (ABSTAIN)]. <If DISCUSS or ABSTAIN> I have the following DISCUSS/ABSTAIN level issues: The following are other issues I found with this document that SHOULD be corrected before publication: The following are minor issues (typos, misspelling, minor text improvements) with the document: -8-<- END TEMPLATE -8-<-
- [Int-dir] Open review assignments in intdir Carlos Bernardos via Datatracker