[Int-dir] Re: [NMOP] Re: Intdir early review of draft-ietf-nmop-terminology-07 - diff

[Dirk Hugo <[e-mail]>]

Hi Adrian, thanks for that! Okay for me - being not a native speaker I will
follow your decision.
Regarding analog vs. analogue I would just recommend to be consistent
throughout the document (since I detected more versions of 'analogue' than
'analog'...
Thanks and best regards
Dirk

On Thu, Nov 21, 2024, 10:06 PM Adrian Farrel <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi again,
>
>
>
> Thanks for a very helpful nit-squashing review.
>
>
>
> The proposed changes all look good except:
>
>
>
> OLD
>
>   State:  A particular condition that something (e.g., a resource) is
>
>      in (at a specific time).
>
> NEW
>
>    State:  A particular condition that something (e.g., a resource) is
>
>     in use / available (at a specific time).
>
> END
>
> I don’t see the meaning of the proposed text.
>
>
>
> And I’ll not make s/analog/analogue/  to retain the American spelling.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Adrian
>
>
>
> *From:* Dirk Hugo <[e-mail]>
> *Sent:* 21 November 2024 14:03
> *To:* [e-mail]
> *Cc:* [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]
> *Subject:* [NMOP] Re: [Int-dir] Intdir early review of
> draft-ietf-nmop-terminology-07 - diff
>
>
>
> Hi Adrian, thank you very much for the hint! Sorry to all for not having
> checked carefully enough ;-(
> Attached now you should find the correct file
>
> BR
>
> Dirk
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2024, 1:03 PM Adrian Farrel <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Hi Dirk,
>
>
>
> I appreciate the review.
>
>
>
> The diff you attached compares -02 and -03 of
> draft-sarischo-6gip-aiml-security-privacy.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Adrian
>
>
>
> *From:* Dirk Hugo <[e-mail]>
> *Sent:* 20 November 2024 23:31
> *To:* [e-mail]
> *Cc:* [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> *Subject:* [NMOP] [Int-dir] Intdir early review of
> draft-ietf-nmop-terminology-07 - diff
>
>
>
> Dear all
>
> Attached please see outcome of diff tool regarding nits
>
> BR Dirk
>
> 
>