[Int-dir] Re: [Iot-directorate] Re: Draft I talked about today

[Behcet Sarikaya <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 10:24 AM CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Hi Behcet,
>
> I don't share your view that IETF publications are like academic papers,
> but even if they were, there are journals these days that publicly disclose
> the names of the reviewers, the managing editor and the editor-in-chief of
> each accepted paper. I think this enforces transparency, which I believe is
> also a characteristic of the IETF that differs a bit from other SDOs (no
> offense intended here).
>
>
No, at least in my last publication which was a couple of years ago, those
data are published yearly not in every paper (unanimous review system) .
The authors usually acknowledge whoever they want in the paper.
These are well known.

As I said, I am happy with the current system and do not see any urgent
need to change things.

Behcet

> Thanks,
>
> Carlos
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 5:21 PM Behcet Sarikaya <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> IEEE publication process is very different from the IETF. A very
>> important difference is there are no authors.
>> IETF publications are more like academic papers.
>> I personally prefer to keep it that way.
>>
>> Behcet
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 11:13 AM CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <
>> [e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Suresh,
>>>
>>> Thanks for sharing. As I mentioned in the meeting, I think it'd be good
>>> to include in the RFCs the composition of the IESG when the document was
>>> approved. Something similar to this is done at IEEE, and I think this
>>> improves the transparency of the process in the IETF. While this can be
>>> figured out by looking at the datatracker, I think adding that to the text
>>> of the RFC (automatically) would be better.
>>>
>>> What do you and others think about this? Do you guys have any interest
>>> in reviving this I-D or doing one similar?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Carlos
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 1:42 PM Suresh Krishnan <
>>> [e-mail]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>   This is the draft I talked about in the meeting. Critiques welcome
>>>>
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krishnan-review-process/
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Suresh
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Int-dir mailing list -- [e-mail]
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Iot-directorate mailing list -- [e-mail]
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>>>
>>