[Int-dir] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-19
Ted Lemon via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sun, 23 January 2022 22:41 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C2003A2D6B; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 14:41:37 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ted Lemon via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: int-dir@ietf.org
Cc: dots@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dots-telemetry.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.43.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <164297769741.21935.5814690155836157029@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 14:41:37 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/nS_d3ZONvOcb6E4nCnJ7qFBQ_jc>
Subject: [Int-dir] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-19
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 22:41:38 -0000
Reviewer: Ted Lemon Review result: Ready with Nits I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-dots-telemetry. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>. I do not see any issues in this document that would suggest that the INT Area directors should object to it. The document appears to be a combination of three things: a description of the context in which what is specified would be useful; a collection of advice about operational considerations when using what is specified; and finally the actual specification. To the best of my ability to evaluate it, it seems to be complete, and it should be possible to use it as a basis for an implementation. Although I would prefer to see this document published as three separate documents, each addressing one of the aforementioned topics, I don't think that's a reasonable request to make during last call. As such, I'm going to say that the document is ready to publish as is.
- [Int-dir] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-d… Ted Lemon via Datatracker
- Re: [Int-dir] Intdir last call review of draft-ie… mohamed.boucadair