[Int-dir] Intdir last call review of draft-wkumari-rfc8110-to-ieee-02
Juan-Carlos Zúñiga via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 02 September 2024 13:54 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from [10.244.2.118] (unknown [104.131.183.230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D7BC14CE3F; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 06:54:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Juan-Carlos Zúñiga via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.23.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <172528524538.1093899.13518127007431526489@dt-datatracker-68b7b78cf9-q8rsp>
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 06:54:05 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: UMMTOIZGRL5BQ4SCBNLKLWXTMQAQUIFL
X-Message-ID-Hash: UMMTOIZGRL5BQ4SCBNLKLWXTMQAQUIFL
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-int-dir.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-wkumari-rfc8110-to-ieee.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Reply-To: Juan-Carlos Zúñiga <juzuniga@cisco.com>
Subject: [Int-dir] Intdir last call review of draft-wkumari-rfc8110-to-ieee-02
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/xDw2iJ6h_QCwzfkJPdJdb1f6xnw>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:int-dir-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:int-dir-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:int-dir-leave@ietf.org>
Reviewer: Juan-Carlos Zúñiga Review result: Ready RFC 8110 was developed over 7 years ago at the IETF due to many circumstances at the time. It provided a better solution compared to the widely used at that time open unencrypted alternative. Since then, OWE has been widely implemented and deployed. It makes sense to continue evolution of the specification at the IEEE 802.11 WG, which also has a close relationship with the Wi-Fi Alliance. This I-D simply records that this process will take place, as already agreed upon by both IEEE 802 and IETF SDOs.
- [Int-dir] Intdir last call review of draft-wkumar… Juan-Carlos Zúñiga via Datatracker