[Int-dir] Int-Dir review of draft-ietf-6lo-privacy-considerations-03

jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Thu, 22 September 2016 16:46 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1930312D925; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 09:46:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AzipcSNx1C_K; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 09:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb0-x235.google.com (mail-yb0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2021812DA84; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 09:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb0-x235.google.com with SMTP id d69so55953066ybf.2; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 09:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cIUqtoR8RHltZ1YNbP8qRZPCKAIF5JseBKmoXEnI9hk=; b=k/tv4sJ+LzQHGpQ00crjAZ428RD1SWq2HMChC5xGvFYBQc8/u8kn1rlJWSm7hyc+cZ N26bGKRQPr5LmXLRDZtEh/1PCiyt/g41sxHI180GHJgEf0fXgCtQV8iFuOrOBUr9v5KA f5ZVB6CrcDKcdYiQbenrcIgZUZ8pHbkkQQaZjg8+xTrlcflz38Ze17pyzLlXgQdhAwi5 vZpkE5Miv0OUwfAfNFF22sMILarQCs7AQLKWUoNdZIHcwSDPXaTgd7YMvkaIIMmo+voY tmGCe+MdO6PVfdjLgSbeAKtUm6//LSpG9M/WTAyjHFipsU6fWfRSFi4dzqPrKqv7L+Y+ 5Yvg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cIUqtoR8RHltZ1YNbP8qRZPCKAIF5JseBKmoXEnI9hk=; b=I8kjBdOBYGR380N4Rl48sx678NIW/r4mUsdJFf1lGcSTkiRVnJfwTLbjVD3djC+15f W/L1WGuGUMdjM97A0zaOnxEXedwwNfENnNPuiv6t9/2qcW73sO02IVUvlZBF7SQw73ZR msmnZOJFk/v93PfMXQkZcZ4HMDZhpTzPSj1B7h6w24GQvOhPTK0v13VLtTQjko2lhx1F Q5ZbWa/QoEtJqLBWRxwqsduTHXUUUvW57CLTr2DtdfWTtgSBcGBQNYCkYFidwSDt7oiq ZUJhlmWEwMtiGHU+XQobYtYMnsxy8rLK+WQ/GQ7Ow4R+p+soYYucTFiKWQtWDJIpYNa2 HABg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNqzW1tyHj/N5RKFG/uW521g8ObQ0+9wTCDpCfLBL7SbTTmCtoeIYvYLr49DSFK5B3ghZXxzdq34iOFcg==
X-Received: by 10.37.173.165 with SMTP id z37mr2298293ybi.88.1474562625332; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 09:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.95.67 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 09:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 09:43:44 -0700
Message-ID: <CAC8SSWueSvv547AUAEE3t5PezQbd483rki2wj6wEPXxw+-K3NQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<int-dir@ietf.org>" <int-dir@ietf.org>, "int-ads@tools.ietf.org" <int-ads@tools.ietf.org>, draft-ietf-6lo-privacy-considerations.all@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045dc3027b7477053d1b5d1c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/yqnzwCjoQwtRo_FmDwGUDCKepZc>
Subject: [Int-dir] Int-Dir review of draft-ietf-6lo-privacy-considerations-03
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 16:46:43 -0000

I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-6lo-privacy-
considerations-03
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lo-privacy-considerations-03>.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area
Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments
just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and
resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been
received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see
http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate.html.

Document: draft-ietf-6lo-privacy-considerations-03
Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
Review Date: 9/22/2016
IETF LC End Date:
IESG Telechat date: (if known)

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:

1) Page 4 first paragraph states it takes a year to scan 26 bit of id
space. Even if the math is given in the next paragraph it is not clear what
are the assumptions to number of devices per link. I take it is one device
on that link.

2) Page 5 table has "6 or ???" for NFC.. it would be good to either replace
"???" with something meaningful or explain why "???".

Regards,
 Jouni