Re: [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Tue, 20 October 2020 20:00 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0389F3A1350; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.146
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.146 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PfW-wxbIJhQR; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [IPv6:2001:67c:27e4::14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF4D13A1351; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2800:810:464:b9c:69b8:4602:916c:a007] (unknown [IPv6:2800:810:464:b9c:69b8:4602:916c:a007]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 475EC2839E9; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 19:59:56 +0000 (UTC)
To: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>, int-dir@ietf.org
Cc: last-call@ietf.org, draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum.all@ietf.org, v6ops@ietf.org
References: <160316271478.8259.14048977655674076984@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Message-ID: <0372f5d1-a076-2870-478a-1e8709d51553@si6networks.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:43:10 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <160316271478.8259.14048977655674076984@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/zjt1s4WUjlbVpp3HvTryaB_Q-bc>
Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 20:00:05 -0000

Hello, Sheng,

Thanks so much for your comments! In-line....

On 19/10/20 23:58, Sheng Jiang via Datatracker wrote:
[...]
> Overall Summary:
> 
> This draft is a document that intents to be an Informational  RFC. This
> document gives some recommendation to  improve the reaction and performance of
> Customer Edge Routers in the IPv6 renumbering events.  It updates RFC7084.
> 
> Overall this is a well written document. There is a small Nit: in the
> information reference, [I-D.gont-6man-slaac-renum] has been listed twice.

Note: [I-D.gont-6man-slaac-renum] is referenced to Ack the folks that 
reviewed that document, on which the present one is based.


> However, I have a more fundamental question. It may be easily addressed by AD
> saying it was not an issue: as an informational document, it should only give
> information or recommendation to the readers or implementors. However, this
> document has a lot of "MUST", which is too strong and I think it should only
> appear in Standard Stack or BCP documents. If so, this document may need
> revise, even rework in the WG.

Please see Section 2. Those terms are *not* being employed as in 
RFC2119, and are employed in the same was as in RFC7084, which this 
document means to update.

Thanks!

Cheers,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492