[Ioam] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on charter-ietf-ioam-00-02: (with COMMENT)

"Suresh Krishnan" <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> Thu, 16 February 2017 04:54 UTC

Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ioam@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ioam@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 805FC12996F; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 20:54:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.43.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148722086748.31421.12851182598271162879.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 20:54:27 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ioam/uZ-rIVpsObuFVu-ryB7q8Y7yQ1I>
Cc: aretana@cisco.com, ioam@ietf.org, ioam-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [Ioam] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on charter-ietf-ioam-00-02: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ioam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: Discussion on In-Situ OAM <ioam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ioam>, <mailto:ioam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ioam/>
List-Post: <mailto:ioam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ioam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ioam>, <mailto:ioam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 04:54:27 -0000

Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-ioam-00-02: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-ioam/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I would like to have a bit more clarity about the difference between the
SRv6 and the IPv6 encapsulations and why two different ones are required.