IETF Logo Mail Archive

[iola-conversion-tool] Questions on data showing on ad status page

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Wed, 01 February 2012 00:48 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD5BF21F84A1 for <iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:48:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PWC8TvmOiuiQ for <iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:48:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC4921F84A0 for <iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:48:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unexplicable.local ([216.239.45.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q110mbmK084237 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:48:37 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <4F288BDF.40404@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:48:31 -0800
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 216.239.45.20 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Subject: [iola-conversion-tool] Questions on data showing on ad status page
X-BeenThere: iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the IOLA / DB Schema Conversion Tool Project <iola-conversion-tool.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iola-conversion-tool>, <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iola-conversion-tool>
List-Post: <mailto:iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iola-conversion-tool>, <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:48:39 -0000

Please compare
<https://tracker.tools.ietf.org/doc/ad/robert.sparks/>

to

<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/ad/robert.sparks/>

especially in the section on published RFCs.

I see one row (RFC6446) where the row has some spurious information
about a long-past IESG telechat.

RjS

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email