Re: [iola-wgcharter-tool] Trial site available for WG Charter Tool

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 13 September 2011 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: iola-wgcharter-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iola-wgcharter-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7662D21F8B64 for <iola-wgcharter-tool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:13:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.776
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.776 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.822, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100, WEIRD_PORT=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X7GisDL6x1I3 for <iola-wgcharter-tool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:13:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18B821F8B6F for <iola-wgcharter-tool@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.105] (pool-173-71-46-224.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [173.71.46.224]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p8DJFcbB072894 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:15:38 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-61-479205524
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <33829A92-3BAB-49AE-B87F-7CD68C93C181@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:15:38 -0500
Message-Id: <C851F718-1D1D-412D-A7F6-C761CC8A848C@nostrum.com>
References: <AD4BBA2D-C1F1-4DFA-AC87-A5660AD0F686@vigilsec.com> <33829A92-3BAB-49AE-B87F-7CD68C93C181@nostrum.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 173.71.46.224 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: iola-wgcharter-tool@ietf.org, Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Subject: Re: [iola-wgcharter-tool] Trial site available for WG Charter Tool
X-BeenThere: iola-wgcharter-tool@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the IOLA / WG Charter Tool Project <iola-wgcharter-tool.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iola-wgcharter-tool>, <mailto:iola-wgcharter-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iola-wgcharter-tool>
List-Post: <mailto:iola-wgcharter-tool@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iola-wgcharter-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iola-wgcharter-tool>, <mailto:iola-wgcharter-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:13:34 -0000

I haven't seen any response to this. 

I'd still like to help test the tool, but can't make progress without feedback.

RjS

On Sep 1, 2011, at 4:07 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:

> I tried to test this tool this afternoon, and quickly ran into a crash - the traceback is attached.
> 
> Some questions/observations to help with my next attempt to test:
> 
> 1) It was not obvious where the tool was - Henrik pointed me to the new "Working Groups" link under
> the secretariat portion of the left navigation bar. Is that the only point of entry? 
> 
> 2) I tried to create a new group from scratch leading to the attached crash - The crash happened before it
> asked me for charter text - was that going to be on the next page? On the page that it did provide me, it asked
> several questions that seem to be out of place (or at least fairly high-impedence) - asking for a mailing list,
> the subscription link, and the archive link separately. It's also asking for chairs/advisors/etc at the very beginning.
> In the normal case for a brand new working group, that's information that will come later. Is it the expectation that
> the initial form will have lots of empty fields when submitted - if so, would it make more sense to design an initial
> form that captured what would normally be populated, and an edit form that let you add these other things as they
> became available?
> 
> 3) How do you start an action on an existing working group? Is that integrated into the existing working group pages
> in any way? (It's really not obvious that you should hit the "create WG" button if you're wanting to start a charter update
> effort.)
> 
> 4) You might consider offering a way to edit a charter version online instead of only through a file upload.
> 
> 5) I tried to take the AUN group that's there through to approved so I could start a recharter effort on that
> (to see if I could get a charter-ietf-aun-01-00). But I can't see how it's possible to do that. Can you describe the path
> for me? (This might be the same answer as for 3).
> 
> 6) Is there anything that the tool does when a charter is marked as in the approved state other than just capturing
> that state? Does it touch any other tables/create or update the published wg charter/etc. or is it expected that is still
> manual secretariat action?
> 
> RjS
> 
> <AttributeError at _wgrecord_create_.html>
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
>> Date: August 30, 2011 5:20:30 PM CDT
>> To: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
>> Cc: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
>> Subject: Fwd: Trial site available for WG Charter Tool
>> 
>> Since ADs will be the users of this tool, I would like to have a few volunteers to make sure it does what we want.
>> 
>> Russ
>> 
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
>>> Date: August 30, 2011 11:25:49 AM EDT
>>> To: iola-wgcharter-tool@ietf.org, Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org>
>>> Subject: [iola-wgcharter-tool] Trial site available for WG Charter Tool
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> The developer (Martin Qvist, IOLA) has now indicated that he's done with
>>> the development of the WG Charter tool (as far as he can tell, from his
>>> end of things).
>>> 
>>> There is a trial version of the tool available here:
>>> 
>>> http://beta.iola.dk:10003/
>>> 
>>> It would be helpful if we could get some testers to exercise the tool
>>> now!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> (There is one issue which I'll take up for discussion in a separate message;
>>> and that's a possible issue with the specification rather than the code.)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> 
>>> 	Henrik
>> 
>